Re: [elephant-devel] Bug in GET-CON

2009-10-17 Thread Alain Picard
"Leslie P. Polzer" writes: > FWIW I guess most projects wouldn't accept such a patch. It's I understand that perfectly, which is why I was happy to provide a new patch. No harm done. It's just that I've forced everone on my team for 10 years to use the same .emacs file, so there's never any "e

Re: [elephant-devel] Bug in GET-CON

2009-10-17 Thread Leslie P. Polzer
Alain Picard wrote: > That's because my emacs automatically cleans up the whitespace > as a file saving hook --- something I would heartily recommend > to any developer using emacs. But since this isn't my project, > I will again try to make a simpler patch. FWIW I guess most projects wouldn't

Re: [elephant-devel] Bug in GET-CON

2009-10-17 Thread Alain Picard
Alain Picard writes: OK - here is a MINIMAL patch. It applies with patch -p1 < /tmp/patch. Hope this one works! --ap diff -rN -wu old-elephant-1.0-work/src/elephant/controller.lisp new-elephant-1.0-work/src/elephant/controller.lisp --- old-elephant-1.0-work/src/elephant/controller.lisp 20

Re: [elephant-devel] Bug in GET-CON

2009-10-17 Thread Alain Picard
"Leslie P. Polzer" writes: > Alain Picard wrote: > >>> You could also make a Darcs patch using "darcs record" followed by >>> "darcs send -o mypatch", although in the general case I prefer plain >>> diffs. >> >> OK - here's a patch produced as above. > > Thank you, this one applies. > > But the p

Re: [elephant-devel] Bug in GET-CON

2009-10-17 Thread Leslie P. Polzer
Alain Picard wrote: >> You could also make a Darcs patch using "darcs record" followed by >> "darcs send -o mypatch", although in the general case I prefer plain >> diffs. > > OK - here's a patch produced as above. Thank you, this one applies. But the patch is very cluttered since it's full of