Re: [elephant-devel] Fix for LispWorks 5.1

2009-06-28 Thread Chun Tian (binghe)
Hi, Leslie The only else "caching stuff" I found in "classes.lisp" is the class definition of "cacheable-persistent-object", I moved it into "cache.lisp" and this change didn't break the build on LispWorks 5.1, so only two definitions are moved to "cache.lisp": (defclass cacheable-persist

Re: [elephant-devel] Fix for LispWorks 5.1

2009-06-28 Thread Leslie P. Polzer
Hi Chun, > I found a way to get pass this issue: moving above definition out of > "class.lisp", to, i.e. "cache.lisp", then everythings go fine. I run > some BDB tests, seems OK. Thanks for this fix; maybe you could send a patch that moves all of the caching stuff to cache.lisp? That would save

Re: [elephant-devel] SBCL compilation warnings

2009-06-28 Thread Leslie P. Polzer
Leslie P. Polzer wrote: > Yes, it should. Thanks for spotting this, I've filed it as bug #84. This one's fixed. Leslie -- http://www.linkedin.com/in/polzer ___ elephant-devel site list elephant-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailma