Re: [elephant-devel] unique object IDs and OIDs

2009-05-05 Thread Tomo Matsumoto
> What are you building with Elephant? A web application framework named web4r. (http://github.com/tomoyuki28jp/web4r/tree/master) - The goal is "Enables users to develop web applications with the shortest codes". - It currently only works with the elephant v0.9, but I am working on it to support

Re: [elephant-devel] unique object IDs and OIDs

2009-05-05 Thread Tomo Matsumoto
> It does return NIL for me, at least with BDB on 1.0-latest: > > ? (ele::controller-recreate-instance *store-controller* 55) > NIL Oh, I was trying with the classname optional parameter, and it recreates an instance when there is no instance associated with the oid. ex: (ele::controller-recre

Re: [elephant-devel] unique object IDs and OIDs

2009-05-05 Thread Leslie P. Polzer
> What I have been looking for is tihs: > (defun get-instance-by-oid (class oid) > (awhen (ele::controller-recreate-instance *store-controller* oid) > (when (typep it class) > it))) > > Thanks for your help, Leslie! You're welcome. :) What are you building with Elephant? Leslie -

Re: [elephant-devel] unique object IDs and OIDs

2009-05-05 Thread Leslie P. Polzer
Tomo Matsumoto wrote: > Thanks for your response, Alex. > > When we pass a nonexistent oid to controller-recreate-instance, it > recreates an instance, but I am looking for a function which returns > nil. It does return NIL for me, at least with BDB on 1.0-latest: ? (ele::controller-recreate-ins

Re: [elephant-devel] unique object IDs and OIDs

2009-05-05 Thread Tomo Matsumoto
Thanks for your response, Alex. When we pass a nonexistent oid to controller-recreate-instance, it recreates an instance, but I am looking for a function which returns nil. Is there such a function? (Or a way to implement such.) Thanks in advance. Tomo On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Alex Miz

Re: [elephant-devel] CCL omittance in new schema code?

2009-05-05 Thread Leslie P. Polzer
> *sigh* Turns out I wasn't fully up to date... again. Who could have > guessed that Ian committed a bag of CCL fixes in the last couple of > weeks? > > Everything seems to work fine now on CCL. Or not. I've encountered the problem again, so I'm also resuming my original plan to commit the fix.