Thank you, Alex, that is a very nice solution. I have committed it to
the main repo.
Yes, I thought it did work in at least one place.
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 10:51 +0300, Alex Mizrahi wrote:
> RLR> However, fixing those tests (or the concurrency problem they
> RLR> represent) under SBCL is a
RLR> However, fixing those tests (or the concurrency problem they
RLR> represent) under SBCL is a high priority.
what do you mean by "fixing under SBCL"? do you think they are working on
some other implementation?
very unlikely..
i've improved and extended concurrency tests, and they work most
