The one thing that stands out is the each-display-is-a-workspace thing,
which I swear someone brought up long ago. ;)
But yeah, I think that's a better way of attacking it than having the whole
"canvas" of displays being one workspace (as we do now).
On Jun 29, 2013 2:27 AM, "Christian Dywan" wro
On 27.06.2013 04:58, Daniel Fore wrote:
> Dudes, they nailed it. We should of thought of it sooner.
>
> http://www.macworld.com/article/2042936/hands-on-with-os-x-mavericks-multiple-display-support.html
>
I must be missing something, but I've used that stuff on Linux for years
and never had artific
I don't think it's a bad idea (at least not if it were implemented well),
but I do think it would take a substantial development effort... too much
effort for such a tertiary feature.
On Jun 28, 2013 1:31 PM, "Allen Lowe" wrote:
> I think independent workspaces on each monitor is actually terribl
entary-dev-community] Multi-Display Support
I think independent workspaces on each monitor is actually terrible. super
confusing.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Daniel Fore mailto:dan...@elementaryos.org> > wrote:
Dudes, they nailed it. We should of thought of it sooner.
http://www.macw
I think independent workspaces on each monitor is actually terrible. super
confusing.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Daniel Fore wrote:
> Dudes, they nailed it. We should of thought of it sooner.
>
>
> http://www.macworld.com/article/2042936/hands-on-with-os-x-mavericks-multiple-display-suppor
5 matches
Mail list logo
