2012/5/16 Allen Lowe :
> I agree with Dan, We should use 0.9 for this release, keep it simple,
> and get it shipped. There will be more time for those types of changes
> in Luna+1
>
> Happy Hacking,
> Allen Lowe
0.9 is quite problematic too, for example, I have no idea how to
create scale and expo
I agree with Dan, We should use 0.9 for this release, keep it simple,
and get it shipped. There will be more time for those types of changes
in Luna+1
Happy Hacking,
Allen Lowe
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Daniel Foré wrote:
> I haven't had any problems at all with 0.9. I'm wondering how ma
I haven't had any problems at all with 0.9. I'm wondering how many people
actually have? Like I said before, there's not exactly been a massive
amount of complaints about 12.04 having shitty compiz.
So tbh I really wouldn't waste any time on trying to get 0.8. Especially if
we're planning to switc
2012/5/15 Mario Guerriero
> The indicator stuff is half done. It will be completelly ready in theese
> days!
w00t! I'll try to land it to the OS as it happens!
> Also, Sergey, did you find a solution for the compiz problem? If not I
> think we can also use compiz 0.9 with no problems
>
Not yet
I'm on the Plymouth stuff, I've got quite some experience with that. I
could use some help on gfxboot and other parts of the boot process, though.
You'd better polish Compiz before I land it because it's not easy to
convert exported profiles to plugin defaults. I think I'll have to write a
script
Hey guys,
I just wanted to give a quick rundown of the things we need to accomplish
in order to go public beta (not including app work, just OS work).
1. *Boot/Login*. There's going to be some more seriously work done by
Canonical for system compositor and lightdm from boot and stuff, so f
6 matches
Mail list logo
