In my admittedly quick scan of the
manual I still have some unanswered questions.
1. What step sizes are available for:
DSP BW (50?)
PBT
CW Pitch
2. What is the range of AGC SLP? Wasn't
there some discussion of a mode emulating
the K2 AGC (i.e. piecewise linear approximation)?
3.
N6KR:
>2. Some combinations of settings can end up being very confusing,
except for the advanced and/or experimentally inclined operator who can
recognize the side effects. This has been endlessly played out on some
of our competitors' rigs. I had sought to avoid such difficulties once
it became c
http://www.theworldlink.com/articles/2007/10/06/news/doc4707c03901b23958789121.txt
"The EU's decision was irresponsible and not based on sound science,"
said Joe Smetana, a principal engineer and tin whisker expert with French
telecommunications equipment maker Alcatel-Lucent SA. "We're solving
Whoa! Has Elecraft's customer base been replaced by people incapable of
installing a power connector? Tell me it isn't so!
73, Bill W4ZV
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscr
I recently shipped a used TS-930S digital board to Denmark from here in NC. It
was shipped on 1 October and was received 5 October. Packaged weight was ~1
pound which cost $10.40 via "First Class Mail International" (the new name USPS
uses for what was previously called Air Mail).
I know many have suggested using egg crates as
parts containers for Elecraft kits but here's a hint that may be
of help to some. Rather than using the 1 dozen egg crates
found at your local supermarket, ask your favorite restaurant
for a few of the larger size they use for eggs in bulk.
Several have commented about ESD. The 12" X 12" pressed paper egg
crates are guaranteed not to cause ESD damage your K3's screws, nuts,
standoffs and lockwashers! ;-)
These crates come in a large case holding 30 dozen eggs. There are 12
total holding 30 eggs each (6X5)...and the price is cheape
Very interesting news Craig! Especially the
SDR issues we previously discussed here on the list:
LP-Pan SDR Panadapter for Elecraft K3 (prototype stage)...
* Optimized for K3
* Up to +/- 96 kHz display on PC
* 8.215 MHz center frequency for centered display
* Switching quadrature dete
KZ1X:
>Hmmm. Isn't the display in question actually a link to Clifton Labs?
No it's not the same thing. This is only the interface
between the K3 output, including buffered amplifier, QSD detector
(probably similar to Softrock) and two isolated I and Q outputs
which are fed to a sound
Hi Frank,
GI4NKB:
>Why would I want to remove my hands from
keyboard and mouse to reach across a bench to fiddle with knobs when a
mouse click or click and drag can do the same only quicker? To state
that a mouse or keyboard does not make for rapid tweaking is akin to
saying a keyboard and mous
N6TQS:
>Given that "no knobs" operations are pretty new, and only possible
with some radios, I think you may be confusing a correlation with a
causation. When "no knobs" operators have the experience that "with
knobs" operators do, then we may see different results. It also is
dependent on the "n
Hi Frank (and Duane),
Thanks for the copy from Duane N9DG. I certainly
agree that SDRs have a lot of glitz that appeals to some,
but the simple fact remains that SDRs have not gained
popularity with top-level contesters outside the realm
of VHF (which is very different than major HF cont
W2KJ:
>Am wondering though if the Elecraft lab has made any measurements in
comparing the performance of the 5 pole 500hz CW filter as opposed to the 8
pole 400hz CW filter.
http://marc.info/?l=elecraft&m=118970837128258&w=2
Here you go! These are recent measurements from our lab.
Filter
AA4NN:
>Wait a minute. Does the act of putting in a specific filter tell DSP
what compensation to do OR must we dumb operators try to
guess at what compensation number to enter? And how would
that number be entered?
Read the manual for roofing filters.
http://www.elecraft.com/manual/K
http://www.v8.pa7fm.nl/pictures.htm
Scroll down to last picture.
73, Bill W4ZV
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, s
CT1BOH:
If I don't copy you from CT3NT, forgive me no K3's yet from over there.
I still have a very slight hope of getting mine (ordered May 1) by next
Friday in time for CQWW. My guess is it will arrive while I'm away
celebrating our wedding anniversary in 6Y5 the week after. Oh well, mayb
HB9DRV:
>I am so very impressed with my K3 that I am now seriously considering
changing the order for the KRX3-F High Performance Sub-receiver to a 2nd K3
(10W basic, pre-assembled).
Good idea but be aware you forego diversity reception
unless you find a way to lock both to the same ref
I forgot to mention you'll still have about $5k
left from your IC-7800 proceeds even after paying
for both K3s (one with KRX3 and one without). :-)
73, Bill W4ZV
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft
WC1M:
>The Orion has a
famous flaw where it switches in an amplifier to compensate for losses in
the 500 Hz and 250 Hz roofing filters, but the gain is too high and the
dynamic range goes all to heck.
Dick I believe the flaw in Orion was actually routing the
signal first through the 20 k
WC1M:
The Orion does a good enough job with DSP that it isn't easy to distinguish
between 600Hz, 400Hz, or 200Hz.
Dick the K3 has a visual passband indicator that gives you an indication of
the passband in octaves (e.g.. ~250 Hz, 500 Hz and 1000 Hz for CW). I
doubt I'll miss reading BW to t
KK7P re W4TV:
>Please be assured that we appreciate your thoughtful and constructive
comments on the K3.
I strongly second that Lyle...I only wish Joe had
been one of your beta testers because of the quality of
his suggestions. Keep that in mind for the K4! ;-)
W4CAK:
>I have listened to both the recordings of the K3 very carefully
and notice some raspiness in the cw note.
HB9DRV:
>It's the recording.
I agree. Having been using my trusty TS-930S for the
past 7 months, I know what good CW audio should sound like.
One of the more striking first
DJ7MGQ::
And, imho, the use of ALC to continuously control the exciter is usually not a
good idea, unless the timing and other characteristics of the ALC match the
exciter perfectly.
I agree. I have *never* used ALC in >50 years. It causes
more problems than it solves, especially on CW.
WA6HHQ:
We have just released new versions of the K3's firmware and of the K3
firmware downloader.
Wow...my first update experience! What an absolutely painless process!
Didn't even have to reboot my rig and everything was updated.
Nice job guys!
Bill W4ZV
___
WB3ANQ:
>Can the temperature reading be shown on the display?
Both the Front Panel and PA temperature can
be seen by pressing DISP and scrolling the Sub knob.
Also UTC, date, current, voltage and several other
parameters, some of which I haven't figured out the
use for yet! I'll leave
KA2NLM:
>I got my K3 yesterday (SN 132, order confirmation 5/1). I am happily
assembling it, but I have come across a possible problem.
Gordon you should ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] which
is set up for exactly these type of questions. They DO
respond on weekends. If everyone starts doing t
Here's a tip for setting up the 500 Hz filter if you use one. The actual 6
dB bandwidth is 565 Hz, so in the FLx BW menu I set 0.60. This means the
500 Hz filter is activated at WIDTH = 600 instead of 500. The advantage of
this is when you use DUAL PB. That function sets the narrow passband
I wrote:
> ...he advantage of this is when you use DUAL PB. That function sets
> the narrow passband to 150 Hz and the wider passband to 600 Hz.
KK7P wrote:
>The wider passband is 600 Hz at its narrowest setting, YOU can make it
much wider just by rotating the WIDTH control once you are in DUAL
K0PP:
>Mine has 6, 2.8, 2.1, 1 and .4 kHz 8-pole roofing filters.
>It's amazing that I can move from the widest to the narrowest
filter with a twirl of the "Width" control while tuned to a CW
signal ... using the NEAT "CWT" feature ... and not hear any
sign that I've (actually, the radio) has s
W4TV:
>However, the 250 Hz filter is actually 370 Hz at the - 6dB
points according to previous e-mail here.
>With the K3, the point of diminishing returns for IMD (and
close in rejection) is perhaps - 30dB instead of -60dB or
more in a conventional crystal filter only radio.
>If we use a strai
W4TV:
>Expanding the 200/250 analysis to 200/250/400/500 as I did
privately for someone else:
200 250 400 500
-
- 6dB 224 370 435 565 Hz
-60dB 896 777 913 1751 Hz
I wrote:
>the 500 Hz will adequately reject a
signal at 1092/2 = 546 Hz versus the 400 at 873/2 = 436 Hz
or a difference of only ~100 Hz from the center
frequency...which could easily be taken care of in
extreme cases by using SHIFT.
Oops...inserted a wrong number in there...should be:
The download went fine again after in initial glitch which required
removing power to shut the K3 off. My heart skipped a beat when it came
back up with a dark LCD display and the red TX LED flashing. But then I
realized it was reloading and all was OK.
Just for my curiousity,
DSP2 is for the 2nd Receiver
If that is true for the unavailable KRX3, why not treat it identical
to DVR which is also unavailable? Seems confusing to display unavailable
options in two different ways.
73, Bill W4ZV
AJ9C:
>Do I just need a new adapter set up for Kenwood and
plug in or do you need to order a headset/mic from Elecraft?
You only need a Heil AD-1K...I used mine from
the TS-930S I've had for 23 years. My Pro-Set HC-4
works fine including the foot switch connection.
Life is good...and s
I sent this direct to Andy because I included a screen shot
(which the list software will delete). However I'm including
the post for any others that may have similar problems.
73, Bill W4ZV
>There are absolutely NO e-mail\posts coming through here from the g
W4UK;
>Any recommendations for a "high-reverse isolation buffer" circuit?
http://www.telepostinc.com/
LP-PAN Software Defined IQ Panadapter for Elecraft K3 (prototype stage)...
* Optimized for K3
* Up to 192 kHz display on PC
* 8.215 MHz center frequency for centered display
* Switching quadratu
Does anyone know if the K3 will work under
the TS-950 setting for CT-DOS?
73, Bill W4ZV
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber
N3HE:
>The conditions are as follows:
>DX at noise (you know, he's there, copiable at least part of the time, but
any attenuation and he's not there) listening up 1. Pileup: REALLYBIGSIG1
up 1 and REALLYBIGSIG2 up 2. Result: artifacts all over the passband,
again, you know, those bleeps, burb
G3AKF:
>Can someone help please ? I get this error message when I go to xmit-tune.
Most likely you have not assigned a 2.7k or 2.8k filter to
CONFIG:FLTX XX where XX is CW or SB. You must assign for
both modes.
>I am sure there has been an answer on here, but I can't find it
Yes, here is the
K1EP:
>The point of all this is, I would like to see a list.
>I know of no development group that doesn't already
maintain a list of bugs and ongoing projects.
Elecraft does maintain a list of issues that
the Field Test team has access to. Although I can
see arguments both pro and con
HB9DRV:
>The delay in the sub-RX is making me reconsider whether to buy
the sub-RX and instead just buy a second basic K3 to use for RX.
I'm having similar thoughts since I already ordered
a second K3 in September, mainly for SO2R use. For true
diversity, it would be necessary for bot
HB9DRV:
the Navigator provides high-quality soundcard
"USB Audio Codec
Standard Microsoft Audio Device
2 channel Output DAC 16 bit
2 channel Input ADC 16 bit
Codec operates at sampling rates up to 48,000 Hz*
*Most Amateur software applications
N2TK wrote:
>If I picked up a static charge by sliding across my carpet and touched the
mike connector the K2 would reset like I was turning on the power.
A very common problem...see the following related issue from Heil:
http://www.heilsound.com/harmonics.htm#RFI
Fellow builders,
Having built several projects recently (K2, Emtech ZM-2
and Inrad #352 roofing filter kit for my Orion), I recently bought a
Headband Magnifier on eBay in preparation for building KD1JV's
AT Sprint II which makes extensive use of surface mount parts.
I ju
ZL1TW wrote:
>I have read the thread about the lack of volume in the K2 that some chaps
have reported, and personally I find it hard to imagine any problem in that
area.
I agree Ron. On my #4119, normal AF Gain into both
a Heil Pro-set and Radio Shack PRO-50MX is at 9 o'clock and
norm
Do any of you folks have experience running
a laptop from battery power via an inverter? I will be
operating Field Day from a remote location and cannot
use a generator. I'll be using my K2 QRP with a fully-
charged 75AH deep-cycle marine battery topped off by
a 3W solar cell. I'm plann
Thanks to the many who replied. Most suggested
running the laptop directly with DC power or through a
DC to DC converter if voltages were not compatible.
Unfortunately BOTH old laptops I have (Toshiba and
Hitachi) use a direct AC power only with no DC port.
I suppose I could jury rig some
First, my hat is off to all you guys who use QRP all the time!
I normally run full legal power in contests to large antennas (180'
vertical on 160 and an 18 element stack on 10). Rather than running
stations, I would guess all but a handful of my QSO's were S&P, and
I quickly got accustom
K9YC wrote:
>Our 100 watt 3A (K9OR) made 1039 Q's on 40 meters alone.
You may have missed the point Jim. 100 watts is 13 dB stronger
than 5 watts. If most QRP stations like myself found that CQ-ing
was simply not effective and did S&P only, the universe of stations
to work is FAR less.
Hi Chas,
>Third year in a row with the K2, a deep cycle battery and the home
antenna farm.
540 QSOS... all CW in 15 hours of operation.
But...your home antenna farm (3 stacked Skyhawks, a 40m
Yagi, 3 el SteppIR, etc) must be worth ~10 dB over temporary wire
setups. A single 180' wire a
Hi Wayne,
At 11:08 AM 6/29/04, wayne burdick wrote:
QSK...
Where did you have T-R set in the menu? At T-R = 0.00, the receiver is
unmuted very fast, which can cause a small receive artifact with certain
narrow crystal filter and DSP settings. But we recommend using T-R = 0.01
or higher an
G3VVT wrote:
>Reading through the article it appears that the problem occurs when
you test
for frequency offsets inside the 64.455MHz 1st IF 6kHz roofing filter. The
measurements on some of the tests of 5kHz offset and below were apparently
noise limited to -60db region.
>With this in mind,
I wrote:
>unfortunately a plot of the K2's phase noise was not done.
Oops! It is there...on page 16 of the K2 ETR...sorry.
73, Bill W4ZV
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@ma
W1WF wrote:
>The question is, why would you want to have the KAF2 instead of the KDSP2?
Cost, and for some issues the KAF2 will work as well as its
more expensive brother. Many guys have KAF2's sitting in their
desks that have been replaced by KDSP2's, and these are typically
available f
Went back up to Dark Springs Mountain in the Uwharrie National Forest where
I did Field Day. Crazy day...fixed breakfast for XYL at 7AM, cleanup and
setup for guest singing group at local outdoor worship center at 9 AM,
service/performance at 10:30 AM, grabbed a ham biscuit and Coke and headed
VK2NU:
>This talk about end fed halfwaves reminded me of the Fuchs antenna, which is
the multi-band variant of the end fed halfwave. A 40m length of wire acts as
a multiple of 1/2 wave on all bands from 80-10 metres
>The DL QRP club used to supply a kit for the tuning section which also had
an in
Richard, I already sent you my comments directly
as you requested, but feel I should respond to some of the
comments posted here.
By way of background, the only SMT parts I had used
previously were mounting 5 SMT caps on an Inrad roofing filter
kit for my Orion. That went well so
KD5NDB:
>I like the K2 knob with the finger dimple add on. It looks good and works
well. You
can get the finger dimple from Elecraft for about $5. I have put them on
everything K2, K1 and even the KX1.
Amen Don! I don't know why anyone would want anything else.
One suggestion for posit
Hi Mike,
KK5F:
>In short, I know of no other QRP rig made that has the features I need
for portable ops served as well as found in the K1. I bought the K1, even
though it was a kit, because there was (and is) no equivalent rig available
anywhere else.
Preface:
First I'll state that I have a
WB6TMY:
>The only way the rest of us are going to ever get any use out of
the band is to use it and generate some CQ's. Otherwise the DX'ers
will continue having their way.
Isn't this true on every band? That's why we
have QRP calling frequencies away from the mainstream
DX areas.
(Resending with corrected URL)
WB6TMY:
>The only way the rest of us are going to ever get any use out of
the band is to use it and generate some CQ's. Otherwise the DX'ers
will continue having their way.
Isn't this true on every band? That's why we
have QRP calling frequencies away
I don't think anyone posted this to the
Elecraft reflector but I know many QRPers are
here also. If you hear me, call with 1 Watt
before you QRO (more points for us Kritters).
I'll be using my Beverages for receive and will
probably hear you. Good luck with your kills!
7
I've been away for a few days and just read
all of Wayne's and Lyle's comments. WOW! You
guys have really listened, and I believe the market
will richly reward you for that. I have always loved
my K2's ergonomics and performance and it sounds
like you are on track for an encore with the
KK7P:
>With the IF DSP in the K3, the issues that are
of concern in a fully analog radio are less important.
>As long as the crystal filter, which is being
used as a roofing filter, has reasonably good
skirts and ultimate rejection, the DSP will take
care of the rest. The first 20 dB or so
1. Is the RX antenna input for 160-6m a standard
part of the K3 or is a KXV3 also required?
2. Is a KAT3 required for a 2nd TX antenna input?
3. Can both synthesizers be phase-locked or
not? Asked before...Lyle's response inconclusive.
4. Asked before but IMD performance data is
needed for
HB9DRV:
>I have never come a cross a company that listens to customers like
Elecraft does
I strongly second that! Ten-Tec does much
better than most but they are about 10 dB down from
Elecraft. I can't comment on Flex Radio from personal
experience but they also appear to be very resp
K0WA:
>How many roofing filters do you need in a K3?
I would suggest one for SSB and one for CW.
That's basically correct, although it
depends on how you plan to operate (i.e. serious
low band DXing or contests versus casual operating).
Remember that a roofing filter's purpose is to
pre
N9VV:
>I have never understood the
obsession of the modern CW ops with *narrow* filters.
I use my brain and don't seem to miss any QSOs ;-)
Ken there are two issues here. You are
talking about how the ear/brain processes signals
in noise. Indeed there are two different ways
people prefe
Hi Wayne,
N6KR:
>There is a third, equally important issue, and this is often the
dominant one during contests or in pile-ups: Very strong interfering
signals within the passband of the roofing filter can de-sense the
reciever
I respectfully disagree. What you are describing
is measu
I wrote:
>A -42 dBm signal is equivalent to S9+29 dB
using the same definition as above.
Oops...too early. -42 dBm is equivalent
to S9+31 dB not S9+29 dB. Not significant but
I don't like to leave mistakes uncorrected!
Another check is S9+76 (for BDR issues) minus
S9+29 (for IMD issue
>Now maybe some people may see the value of a web based
Forum...no email choking your mailbox. For the record
my freebie Yahoo account has rather limited filtering
capability, so filtering is not really a good option
for me.
You can do that here. I'm subscribed to
many reflectors but n
N6KR:
>The decoder also works for PSK31 and RTTY, and you can transmit in these
modes just by sending CW with the keyer paddle (or an attached
keyboard). This eliminates the computer entirely, should you be so
inclined.
This is going to do wonders for expeditions
using digital modes! I'v
NT1Y:
>What's the performance difference between the 8-pole and 5-pole K3
roofing filters?
Good question, but the answer is more than simply
bandwidth and shape factor. You need to know its performance
*in the radio^ with IMD and BDR measurements. As ARRL
discovered with Orion's 500 Hz
KR2Q:
>PS... And roofing filter "rage" has been around
for quite some time...it is far from an Elecraft phenom.
Yep...at least since the mid-70's when Sherwood
introduced a 600 Hz roofing filter for the Drake R4C.
It addressed exactly the same IMD/BDR issues as today.
Receiver performance
K0WA wrote:
> I am sure many of you have done this alreadybut it is
interesting to meand I thought I would share
>
> 1. FTDX9000 Contest $5699 (no extras)
> 2. Orion II $4395
> 3. K3 $3436 (Includes 5
AE5X:
>As I understand it, the main purpose of a sub-rx is to allow diversity
reception based on the fact that this 2nd receiver would be using a
different antenna than the main rx, correct?
Diversity is probably not what most people use
the Sub-RX for. The main use is more likely to b
W5EWA:
>but now someone says that we DON'T need them all.
Definitely not...unless we have more money than
sense. You need only ONE per major mode, which will
cover the widest bandwidth you ever expect to use in
that mode. For example:
CW - 500 or 400. 250 and 200 are definite overkill
At 07:34 PM 5/4/07, Don Wilhelm wrote:
All of what you say is true *EXCEPT* for one item - and that is the AGC.
Don you are absolutely correct. The reason
I never considered it is that I have never experienced it
with my Orion. I seldom operate with strong signals
spaced much closer
Hi Don,
At 08:47 PM 5/4/07, Don Wilhelm wrote:
I did ask Wayne about the AGC (with respect to the roofing filter
selection) and he indicated that the AGC was developed in hardware
before the A/D conversion and there is additional AGC action created
in the DSP. As I understand it, it is simil
--- Don Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill,
>
> All of what you say is true *EXCEPT* for one item -
> and that is the AGC.
>
>
[...]
> Now, if the signal you are trying to copy is an S-1
> or S-2 level and an
> S-9 signal comes into the roofing filter passband
> (again it may be out
> o
It's deja vu all over again (from May 1).
73, Bill W4ZV
http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/elecraft/2007-May/067147.html
K0WA:
>How many roofing filters do you need in a K3?
I would suggest one for SSB and one for CW.
That's basically correct, althou
KR2Q:
>list the specs that I'd like to see, anticipating
that you will, minimally, cover them.
IMHO that's too much data given that these guys are
trying to get the K3 out. I suggest limiting the list to:
IMD (2 kHz spacing, 14 MHz)
BDR (2 kHz spacing, 14 MHz)
...for at the least the C
I wrote:
>BTW I still cannot fathom 12 roofing filter options...8
optional on the current price list, 1 stock, 3 variable
for the future. Seems like a production and marketing
nightmare to me, especially in a DSP rig which already has
50 Hz variable BW over a wide range. Makes no sense to me!
I
Hi Wayne,
N6KR:
>The key point here is that these are all filters
*are* offered by other manufacturers -- but at
their 2nd or 3rd IFs.
>We offer them at our first I.F.
Of course most of those filters are
going into rigs without an infinitely variableDSP filter following
them. My poi
Regarding comments by W3FPR and N6KR below. I've been
thinking about this and wondering why I have never heard this
in my Orion in nearly 4 years. I've operated in many contests,
including the CQ 160 CW every year with only an Inrad #762
4-pole 600 Hz roofing filter. This environment is
From my previous post:
"As the resolution and speed of ADC hardware improve, digital radio
receivers become less dependent on analog AGC to meet dynamic-range
requirements. State-of-the-art 24-bit IF-DSP converters, such as
those used in the Ten-Tec Orion, produce about 100 dB of dynamic
rang
I wrote:
> Bottom line:
1. Narrower is not always better (Ten-Tec experience)
2. 8-poles is not always better than 5-poles (per Inrad)
3. Let IMD and BDR measurements be your guide
More evidence below to support waiting for IMD/BDR
measurements before ordering any roofing
AE5X:
>I'm surprised that so many roofing filters (and the K3 itself) have been
designed and offered for sale before the specifications are known/posted.
Seems like the reverse order would have been more appropriate.
I was also concerned about so many filters until I realized
Elecraft h
WA6HHQ:
>We were very careful not to make the same mistakes
made by other radio designs.
Thank you Eric! Sorry for being paranoid but
the old axiom "Fool me once...shame on you. Fool me
twice...shame on me." applies to me personally since
I have been burned before...hence my caution.
WA6HHQ:
>Notes:
Since we also transmit through this (2.7 kHz) filter...
Will it be possible to transmit CW through
a narrower filter than the 2.7 kHz to even further
minimize transmitted key clicks and phase noise?
If so, how low in BW could we go before causing
problems? 1 kHz, 500 H
K8CV:
>I found a neat option on the new Orion II that seems great cw. It is not in
the manual. It is called slope or something like that. It is the last item
in the RX menu. It has to do with the audio and normal is flat, probably for
SSB ? But you can set the slope to 1.1 or 2.2 db and I first tr
K8ZOA:
>You might be interested in the AGC input versus output performance data
I took for the K2 and several other receivers.
http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/receiver_agc_curves.htm
>To some extent, the K2 already implements this feature. Whether this is
an intentional design decision or a
I wrote:
>I believe a challenge for Lyle KK7P might be to implement
sloped AGC in K3 using a multi-segmented approximation to the
K2's very soft AGC curve.
If this is possible, I suggest simply calling
it "Soft" versus "Hard" in the AGC Menu. I feel we run
the risk of making things far
K0WA:
>Who makes the PC Boards?
Who stuff's the boards? (or what ever you do to surface mount components)
Who checks the boards?
Who fixes the boards?
Probably someone like Solectron, Flextronics
Sanmina or a dozen other companies who manufacture
loaded boards. It's most definitely not
At 02:03 PM 5/9/07, you wrote:
Flextronics. *runs away, screaming*
What does that mean? Ever heard of these
companies? HP, Dell, Microsoft, Nokia, Motorola,
ABB, Siemens...even Philips in your home country.
http://www.flextronics.com/en/portals/0/presentations/q32003/sld016.htm
N2RD:
>I will be replacing my Yaesu 1KMP with the K3. My Yaesu rig has some
Inrad and Yaesu optional filters for the 8.215Mhz IF. Will I be
able to use them in the K3?
It's my understanding the filters are identical
electrically, but use a different mechanical configuration.
Therefor
N2DTS wrote:
>The K3 2.7 KHz filter is just the first filter, unless
you have real strong local signals close, you likely wont have
any problems.
This is very good advice. Some may forget that
the DSP filters in the 2nd IF are the primary means for
achieving selectivity. The 1st IF roo
Hi Mike,
Sienna design goals (not final specs):
MDS: -130dB (preamp off)
IP3: +25dBm at 5 kHz spacing; preamp off
Blocking Dynamic Range: >125 dB at 5 kHz spacing
2-Tone Dynamic Range: >90 dB at spacings >= 5 kHz
http://www.getboost.com/dz/sienna_specs.htm
These are nothing gre
Over the past month or so, I've been taking
my K2 (#4119) to a remote mountaintop cabin for
R&R with my XYL. This location is quite remote
and previous visits seemed to be very RFI-quiet on
the other bands, so I decided to install a Beverage
on October 12 and try listening on 160. It is
1 - 100 of 306 matches
Mail list logo