Re: [Elecraft] Re: Spam filters [END OF THREAD]

2007-07-09 Thread Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft
We do have a subscribe confirmation requirement - and the spammers still get around it. qth.net and we are too big of a target. Let's end this thread. Its taking up way too much bandwidth on the list. Also, guys, please do not try to moderate the list. I'll jump in as needed. If you think a th

Re: [Elecraft] Re: Spam filters WAS "We are not talking about a small amount of money"

2007-07-09 Thread Thom LaCosta
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Bob Nielsen wrote: On Jul 9, 2007, at 9:12 AM, Thom LaCosta wrote: On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote: The spam filtering is applied at our Elecraft list host, qth.net, and is not under our control. It is absolutely needed. Without it we have had

Re: [Elecraft] Re: Spam filters WAS "We are not talking about a small amount of money"

2007-07-09 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Jul 9, 2007, at 9:12 AM, Thom LaCosta wrote: On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote: The spam filtering is applied at our Elecraft list host, qth.net, and is not under our control. It is absolutely needed. Without it we have had literally hundreds of spammers 'subscr

Re: [Elecraft] Re: Spam filters

2007-07-09 Thread Thom LaCosta
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Tom Hammond wrote: So, it doesn't take much... darn little, actually, to cause the SPAM-COP detectors to start ringing. Spamassasian allows the user to specify words that could cause a message to be trappedit sounds fine in theory...but it's possible to enter a word

Re: [Elecraft] Re: Spam filters WAS "We are not talking about a small amount of money"

2007-07-09 Thread Thom LaCosta
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote: The spam filtering is applied at our Elecraft list host, qth.net, and is not under our control. It is absolutely needed. Without it we have had literally hundreds of spammers 'subscribe' to the list and attempt to post. We still see th

[OT] Re: [Elecraft] Re: Spam filters WAS "We are not talking about a smallamount of money"

2007-07-09 Thread Bill W5WVO
This is woefully off-topic, but I cannot let this pass uncommented. The quote in the previous post attributed to Franklin is one of many, many misquotes floating around out there. The correct quote (see http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin and related links on that page) is as follow

Re: [Elecraft] Re: Spam filters WAS "We are not talking about a small amount of money"

2007-07-09 Thread W2AGN
Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote: > The spam filtering is applied at our Elecraft list host, qth.net, and is > not under our control. > > It is absolutely needed. Without it we have had literally hundreds of > spammers 'subscribe' to the list and attempt to post. We still see the > attempts he

Re: [Elecraft] Re: Spam filters WAS "We are not talking about a small amount of money"

2007-07-09 Thread Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft
The spam filtering is applied at our Elecraft list host, qth.net, and is not under our control. It is absolutely needed. Without it we have had literally hundreds of spammers 'subscribe' to the list and attempt to post. We still see the attempts here daily. In general, if you get a bounce me

Re: [Elecraft] Re: Spam filters

2007-07-09 Thread Ian Stirling
On Monday 09 July 2007 04:10:17 Julian G4ILO wrote: > Yes, I did get a bounce message back to say that my reply "looked like > spam". I suspect your two web site references in your signature. Spam filters are suspicious of external references, and I think the word "best" following one of them ma

Re: [Elecraft] Re: Spam filters

2007-07-09 Thread Julian G4ILO
On 7/9/07, Tom Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So, it doesn't take much... darn little, actually, to cause the SPAM-COP detectors to start ringing. Indeed. But why should that be so? This is a membership-only group. There is no need for spam filtering. It wasn't important in this particular

Re: [Elecraft] Re: Spam filters WAS "We are not talking about a small amount of money"

2007-07-09 Thread Thom LaCosta
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Julian G4ILO wrote: How do you know that? Did you get a message saying it was blocked? Was there a reason? Yes, I did get a bounce message back to say that my reply "looked like spam". Why a legitimate reply-to from a registered list member should be considered spam I