wrote:
Kevin KD5ONS wrote:
Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Report for February 4th & 5th, 2007
However, some of the new procedure worked. Hail signs made it
easy to copy folks first time (if the QSB did not eat you up first). But
calling by the numbers needs a little revision. I thi
Hi Geoff:
Of course, DX is welcome to QNI ANY TIME!!!
Cheers,
Tom
At 08:27 AM 2/6/2007, Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy wrote:
Kevin KD5ONS wrote:
Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Report for February 4th & 5th, 2007
However, some of the new procedure worked. Hail signs made it
eas
Kevin KD5ONS wrote:
Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Report for February 4th & 5th, 2007
However, some of the new procedure worked. Hail signs made it
easy to copy folks first time (if the QSB did not eat you up first). But
calling by the numbers needs a little revision. I think I
Sorry about my previous reply, I don't know what happened there.
Anyway, I checked in with my new KX1, S/N 1644, running 3W from here in PA.
Lots of QRN and QSB so difficult copy. I also listened on 40m but didn't hear
much there. I heard Kevin once but not strong enough that I would have even
>From: Kevin Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 2007/02/04 Sun PM 10:07:06 CST
>To: Elecraft
>Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Report for February 4th & 5th, 2007
>Good Evening,
>Twenty was a bit noisy with QSB. Forty was weak with QSB. Take your
>pi
PM
To: Elecraft
Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Report for February 4th & 5th, 2007
Good Evening,
Twenty was a bit noisy with QSB. Forty was weak with QSB. Take your
pick :) However, some of the new procedure worked. Hail signs made it
easy to copy folks first time (if the QSB
Good Evening,
Twenty was a bit noisy with QSB. Forty was weak with QSB. Take your
pick :) However, some of the new procedure worked. Hail signs made it
easy to copy folks first time (if the QSB did not eat you up first). But
calling by the numbers needs a little revision. I think I
7 matches
Mail list logo
