.3 dB down at 3 kHz
12.6 dB down at 3.4kHz
Fairly close to 1367698438.png but not exact.
(*) a+b, b+c, c+d, ... where samples are a,b,c,d,...
Another possibility is down-sampling from 44.1kHz sound card but I have no idea
how it works.
--fred k
___
ekiga
Hi guys/gals, another voice from the sideline:
First off, I appreciate active developers for thinking about GNOME, UI design,
GTK compatibilities, etc, etc. I/we, users, benefited from YOU a bunch. *Thank
you!*
For GNOME3, I have unfavorable first impression. Tweaking debian 7.0 for a few
hou
Hi,
Eugen said:
I personally used it successfully in public wi-fi networks.
I have had some difficulties with old ekiga in wireless environment. I tried
ekiga 4.0.1 both in wireless and wired environment; results are somewhat
reversed.
ekiga 2.0.12 works perfectly on a wired network but ver
ekiga-list@gnome.orgWhat I get is as followsEkiga 4.0.1 shows erroneous
behavior when wireless network is involved. Actions took very long if not fail,
works ok sometimes.
Here's some results from my experiments. I used debian 7 live 486 failsafe
(i.e., older UI) with some lib files from debian
The first paragraph in my previous message reads:
"Ekiga 4.0.1 shows erroneous behavior when wireless network is involved. Actions
took very long if not fail, works ok sometimes."
Apologize to bother. Some garbage have been prepended.
fred_k
___
eki
Hi Eugen,
I suspect that there is a DNS specific problem. So please try the following as
a first test: Use the wired interface...
Sure, I'll report it back to you.
Here's one bad news. I'm having difficulty completing 'apt-get update' for
unstable repository today. Insufficient memory for
Hi Eugen,
Changing DNS by tweaking resolv.conf returns unfavorable results.
These test results are based on three setups, provided corresponding -d 4 logs.
step 0
live boot to debian 7, dpkg ekiga, apt-get some lib files;
using wired (ADSL) line, startup ekiga, configure ekiga, run callback tes
Hi guys/gals,
Good news for you. Tweaking DNS pointer makes Ekiga somewhat stable on a
wireless network.
I rewrote /etc/resolv.conf as "nameserver 202.248.xxx.xx" after DHCP on
wireless router completed. The address is the primary DNS at the wired network (ADSL)
provider. When you do this, Ek
Alex wrote:
I use the dns from opendns.com and I have no problem anymore...
Great!
Do we find powerful workaround? How can it be verified (if need to do)? How
should it be documented and where?
fred
___
ekiga-list mailing list
ekiga-list@gnome.org
FYI:
I tried the Echo Test; it responds with PCMA but not with PCMU.
Not speex, not GSM either. (really?) Turning off PCMA and you won't get any
voice.
(tested user agent is ekiga 2.0.12, too old, huh?)
fred_k
___
ekiga-list mailing list
ekiga-list
kyle a.k.a. That Guy,
Do you mean you want encrypted VoIP application, encryption plugin, or
something like SIP-ssl which your partner can handle easily?
I'm novice in security thing but I take Stuart's response as it is:
This would give ekiga essentially the same plug&play peer
functionali
Hi That Guy and all gals and guys,
Let me discern technical issues and non-tech ones. Plus a question regarding "SIP
provider" at the bottom.
That Guy wrote:
$kype will continue to have a long LONG life of spying ahead.
I agree but this is not a technical issue here.
...the chances that th
Thanks Yannick, very informative
Yannick wrote(excerpts):
I assume he was referring to a SIP proxy, ... can solve the NAT issue.
...we could improve the ekiga tools for supporting NAT with an ICE...
...I doubt IPV6 will solve this issue...
fred
___
e
Hi Peter,
As Martin and Eugen said in their messages, you are in right and friendly world
here with Ekiga.
As for Skipe-Microsoft-Facebook-mobile things, my motivation has been like
yours.
fred/user, Ekiga on debian
___
ekiga-list mailing list
ekig
Looks like two questions.
Any suggestions?
Gerente wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use Fedora 20 and still could not use ekiga to talk to another
> computer or smartphone.
>
> It is like ekiga can not enter on another network. Is there any door
> to open on modem?
>
> And I still do not understand well about
15 matches
Mail list logo
