Hi Eugen
On 17/03/10 17:43, Eugen Dedu wrote:
David Ford wrote:
Hi Eugen
A couple of small things :-
In -
More realistic network, with SIP server
Tho overcome these limitations - and
^
need to register to SIPserver
^
i.e. an extra h and no space
David Ford wrote:
> Hi Eugen
>
> On 17/03/10 17:43, Eugen Dedu wrote:
>> David Ford wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Eugen
>>> A couple of small things :-
>>> In -
>>> More realistic network, with SIP server
>>> Tho overcome these limitations - and
>>>^
>>> need to register to SIPserver
>>>
pal...@inwind.it wrote:
> Thank you for your prompt answer, Eugen.
> Is this behaviour of ekiga.net specified by the standard or is it a choice
> that the standard leaves to the server and client designers?
Since there was a post in the mailing list about another SIP server
which does not need NA
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Eugen Dedu
> wrote:
>> pal...@inwind.it wrote:
>>> While running some server-client compatibility tests I found that linphone
>>> and ekiga.net seem to be incompatible.
>>> Ekiga.net refuses to register the client linphone with the messag
pal...@inwind.it wrote:
> This is exactly the same problem I have. At present I have almost no way to
> talk to friends who use Windows.
> I believe that full compatibility between sip servers and sip clients running
> on different operating systems should be a high priority milestone in the
>
Hi
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Eugen Dedu
wrote:
> pal...@inwind.it wrote:
>> Thank you for your prompt answer, Eugen.
>> Is this behaviour of ekiga.net specified by the standard or is it a choice
>> that the standard leaves to the server and client designers?
>
> Since there was a post in
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Eugen Dedu
wrote:
> Well, to my knowledge, windows version should work. What do you mean by
> "does not work" and "buggy"? I need to find time to work on windows
> version...
If I recall correctly, I was calling (from GNU/Linux) a Windows
client. When the Windo
Hamlet wrote:
> On Monday 08 March 2010 03:16:56 Eugen Dedu wrote:
>>> I have noticed that the amount of debug information printed with the
>>> option "-d N" (even N=5) has dramatcally decreased passing from 3.0.1 to
>>> 3.2.5/6 (including OPAL/PTlib updates).
>>>
>>> Now I get only messages on scr
> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:31:50 +0100
> From: Eugen Dedu
> Message-ID: <4ba0cbb6.8030...@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr>
>
> My Name wrote:
> > Yes, it appears to be fixed. I had 100% success with echo tests. However,
> > at the moment I can't get the Ekiga UI started. Giving up, uninstalling
> > a
> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:00:06 +0100
> From: Eugen Dedu
> Message-ID: <4ba0fc86.1070...@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr>
>
> Given the recent posts (and others), I have just written a page
> http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Understanding_NAT/firewall_issues_with_SIP_clients_%28eg_ekiga%29
> explaining th
aside from diamoncard.us, what other options are there for a DID in
Canada? I only really need the voicemail.
thanks,
Thufir
___
ekiga-list mailing list
ekiga-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Eugen Dedu
wrote:
> Jean-Noël Rivasseau wrote:
>> So, are DTMF tones really well supported on current Ekiga? Should I send
>> these tones as RFC2833 or INFO (I tried both but both had problems)?
>
> Sorry to reply so late.
>
> To my knowledge, DTMF is working, but
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:28 PM, My Name wrote:
> The article says, "For that, before registering, A and B must discover their
> public IP addresses (corresponding to NATA and NATB respectively) and send
> it to ekiga.net, so that they can be contacted afterwards (*TODO why
> ekiga.net cannot sim
My Name wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:00:06 +0100
>> From: Eugen Dedu
>> Message-ID: <4ba0fc86.1070...@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr>
>>
>> Given the recent posts (and others), I have just written a page
>> http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Understanding_NAT/firewall_issues_with_SIP_clients_%28eg_ekiga
Le jeudi 18 mars 2010 à 18:10 +0100, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
> My Name wrote:
> >> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:00:06 +0100
> >> From: Eugen Dedu
> >> Message-ID: <4ba0fc86.1070...@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr>
> >>
> >> Given the recent posts (and others), I have just written a page
> >> http://wiki.ekiga.org/
Le jeudi 18 mars 2010 à 18:17 +0100, yannick a écrit :
> Le jeudi 18 mars 2010 à 18:10 +0100, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
> > My Name wrote:
> > >> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:00:06 +0100
> > >> From: Eugen Dedu
> > >> Message-ID: <4ba0fc86.1070...@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr>
> > >>
> > >> Given the recent posts
yannick wrote:
> Le jeudi 18 mars 2010 à 18:17 +0100, yannick a écrit :
>> Le jeudi 18 mars 2010 à 18:10 +0100, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
>>> My Name wrote:
> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:00:06 +0100
> From: Eugen Dedu
> Message-ID: <4ba0fc86.1070...@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr>
>
> Given the
Le jeudi 18 mars 2010 à 11:28 +0100, Mounir Lamouri a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Eugen Dedu
> wrote:
> > Well, to my knowledge, windows version should work. What do you mean by
> > "does not work" and "buggy"? I need to find time to work on windows
> > version...
>
> If I recal
yannick writes:
> I had chats lasting hours using the GNU/Linux version with the windows
> version at the other end. It is not that broken. If I remember correctly
> there was such issue sometimes, but if the other end give a try it
> works. It was with 3.2.5 on the windows side...
When I call a
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:50:38 -0400
"Mark T. B. Carroll" wrote:
> yannick writes:
>
> > I had chats lasting hours using the GNU/Linux version with the
> > windows version at the other end. It is not that broken. If I
> > remember correctly there was such issue sometimes, but if the other
> > end
kapetr wrote:
> Hello
>
> - Eugen Dedu wrote:
>
>> Message: 6
>> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:31:08 +0100
>> From: Eugen Dedu
>> To: Ekiga mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga on Ubuntu using DSL
>> Message-ID: <4b9f41cc.7060...@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; cha
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:28:34PM +, My Name wrote:
> Indeed, this requires explanation. This is surely the job of the SIP server.
> I certainly do not need a separate STUN server to use a Web browser. The
> Web site has no trouble determining my external IP address.
That is because ther
22 matches
Mail list logo