kapetr wrote:
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:08:00 +1100
>> From: mat101
>> To: Ekiga mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga on Ubuntu using DSL
>> 302G D-Link modem
>> Message-ID: <4b872d00.8040...@netspace.net.au>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="f
While running some server-client compatibility tests I found that linphone and
ekiga.net seem to be incompatible.
Ekiga.net refuses to register the client linphone with the message:
"Registration on sip:ekiga.net failed: Not Acceptable"
Analysis of the logs suggests that this registration refusa
pal...@inwind.it wrote:
> While running some server-client compatibility tests I found that linphone
> and ekiga.net seem to be incompatible.
> Ekiga.net refuses to register the client linphone with the message:
> "Registration on sip:ekiga.net failed: Not Acceptable"
>
> Analysis of the logs su
Thank you for your prompt answer, Eugen.
Is this behaviour of ekiga.net specified by the standard or is it a choice that
the standard leaves to the server and client designers?
Best regards,
Antonio Palamà
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:28:01 +0100
Eugen Dedu wrote:
>
> Yes. ekiga.net does not acc
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Eugen Dedu
wrote:
> pal...@inwind.it wrote:
>> While running some server-client compatibility tests I found that linphone
>> and ekiga.net seem to be incompatible.
>> Ekiga.net refuses to register the client linphone with the message:
>> "Registration on sip:eki
> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:26:21 -0400
> From: Christian Jaeger
> <75514ef21003152326l14610be7ybf6bc32e668dd...@mail.gmail.com>
>
> Regarding STUN, as far as I know Ekiga 3.2.6 *always* uses STUN
> (stun.ekiga.net) (it's "builtin" and not part of the preferences
> anymore).
OK, but they
You may want to consider using the latest linphone version. Now, if the
registrar refuses the registration due to the private IP address,
linphone performs a second attempt with the public IP only. As far as I
could remember, this however only works if the registrar sends a 4xx
errorcode in res
> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:35:39 -0400
> From: Christian Jaeger
> To: Ekiga mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] Outbound use with routers and firewalls
> Message-ID:
> <75514ef21003152335y508f14bdwf2a5375de9abd...@mail.gmail.com>
> PS. note that you are somewhat vague or confusing y
I did try Linphone 3.2.1 on another Linux box and even trying a second time
with the firewall IP it is not able to register on ekiga.net.
Here is the complete message log:
ortp-message-allocating NICT context
ortp-message-Using locally generated SRV record _sip._udp.ekiga.net
ortp-message-About
This is exactly the same problem I have. At present I have almost no way to
talk to friends who use Windows.
I believe that full compatibility between sip servers and sip clients running
on different operating systems should be a high priority milestone in the
process of freeing our speech on t
> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 22:12:29 -0500
> From: Christian Jaeger
> Message-ID:
> <75514ef21003011912l5014b4dcle94b6aa55fc9...@mail.gmail.com>
> I've finally found out how to cure the problem where applications
> using sound like Ekiga (but also Twinkle, QEMU, ...) won't start
> anymore but
Nope, I attached a script (using gmail, and I suppose that works as it
should). Where did you get the bin file from? It will be an issue of
the archival software if you don't manage to get the script out of it.
No I didn't file a bug report to ALSA yet. (Have you read that this
has been suggested
>> > I'm pretty sure I have a definitive answer.
>>
>> A definitive answer for what? Or do you mean you don't have an answer?
>>
>
> The question was whether special provision is needed for firewalls and
> routers, for making outbound calls. As far as I can tell, the answer is an
> unequivocal NO.
> OK, but they need to fix documentation and directions, if they have not
> already.
Who is they? Probably nobody working on Ekiga and related libraries is
paid for their work, and no volunteer is obliged to do anything.
> Currently there is a long, rambling section on use with firewalls and
> ro
Hello,
Iam running ekiga to test it on Ubuntu 9.10.. version of Ekiga is
karmic/main ekiga 3.2.5-1ubuntu1 .
It warned upon startup to enable port forarding manually because my
router isnt forwrding the packets UDP TCP mentioned in the wiki
iam 100% sure that my router has free communication t
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:53:46PM -0400, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> > The question was whether special provision is needed for firewalls and
> > routers, for making outbound calls. As far as I can tell, the answer is an
> > unequivocal NO.
>
> AFAIK this is not true, it's more complicated.
Absol
David Taveras wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Iam running ekiga to test it on Ubuntu 9.10.. version of Ekiga is
> karmic/main ekiga 3.2.5-1ubuntu1 .
> It warned upon startup to enable port forarding manually because my
> router isnt forwrding the packets UDP TCP mentioned in the wiki
>
> iam 100% sure th
Hello Eugene,
You where right.
un...@seveneleven:~$ ekiga -d 4 2>&1|grep STUN
2010/03/16 14:51:23.893 0:03.327 StunDetector:0xb737db70 OPALSTUN
server "stun.ekiga.net" replies Symmetric NAT, external IP
137.107.48.228
What is the importance of forwarding these? None of the other
softp
I need to make Ekiga xsession. It mean how user should to enter directly in
Ekiga fullscreen mode (no need for other applications, because operator can log
out user after session from server). So, it is for cyber cafe, where I want to
have VoIP service, but I don`t want to purchase any SIP or to
> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:49:18 -0400
> From: Christian Jaeger
> Message-ID:
> <75514ef21003160949m48427cd8u738de895bde9f...@mail.gmail.com>
>
> Nope, I attached a script (using gmail, and I suppose that works as it
> should). Where did you get the bin file from?
Here's your message:
> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:53:46 -0400
> From: Christian Jaeger
> Message-ID:
> <75514ef21003160953m5f4a240cvb584fe267be42...@mail.gmail.com>
>
> >> > I'm pretty sure I have a definitive answer.
> >> A definitive answer for what? Or do you mean you don't have an answer?
> > The question
21 matches
Mail list logo