> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:08:00 +1100
> From: mat101
> To: Ekiga mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga on Ubuntu using DSL
> 302G D-Link modem
> Message-ID: <4b872d00.8040...@netspace.net.au>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
> Thanks for th
mat101 wrote:
> Eugen Dedu wrote:
>> mat101 wrote:
>>
>>> ael wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:25:46PM +1100, mat101 wrote:
>>> Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
>>> IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.1.1.10
>>> Subnet Mask . . .
kapetr wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> - PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -
>> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:55:03 +0100
>> From: Eugen Dedu
>> To: Ekiga mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga on Ubuntu using DSL
>> 302G D-Link modem
>> Message-ID: <4b86e3a7.4080...@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr>
>> Content-Type: text
kapetr wrote:
Hi, I'm glad it is working to You.
Yes, I know, what iptel says about NAT - this is what I wrote and I thing
that this workaround works (maybe :-) as I have described.
About that "bridge" mode of Yours modem, I had also thing about it
before I have write to You my previous post.
kapetr wrote:
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:08:00 +1100
From: mat101
To: Ekiga mailing list
Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga on Ubuntu using DSL
302G D-Link modem
Message-ID: <4b872d00.8040...@netspace.net.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Thanks for the
Eugen Dedu wrote:
mat101 wrote:
Eugen Dedu wrote:
mat101 wrote:
ael wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:25:46PM +1100, mat101 wrote:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.1.1.10
Subnet Mask
Le vendredi 26 février 2010 à 09:01 +0100, kapetr a écrit :
> I have spend many hours in studying wireshark and twinkle logs, and I
> 99,999% sure, I'm right: Ekiga can't work behind comon ((port)restricted)
> NAT.
>
I'm sorry to contradict you, but it does work :-)
--
_ Damien Sandras
(
> > Does the code in Ekiga simply preclude such an interaction with a DSL
> > 302G modem (in bridging mode)?
>
> To my knowledge, ekiga does not work in one type of NAT: Symmetric NAT.
> This type of NAT cannot be served by a VoIP program without a "trick".
> Skipe works in this case too becaus
Hello,
Eugen Dedu wrote:
>Thanks for it, I will find a way to solve/analyse it.
>
>For info, I have a port restricted nat and ekiga works, so not all such
>>users are unfortunate like you :o)
>
>--
>Eugen
and
- Damien Sandras wrote:
> > I have spend many hours in studyi
Le vendredi 26 février 2010 à 10:32 +0100, Damien Sandras a écrit :
> Le vendredi 26 février 2010 à 09:01 +0100, kapetr a écrit :
>
> > I have spend many hours in studying wireshark and twinkle logs, and I
> > 99,999% sure, I'm right: Ekiga can't work behind comon ((port)restricted)
> > NAT.
> >
Hello,
as asked by "Yannick Defais" ,
I have add twinkle log and wireshark output to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ekiga/+bug/517580
to comparison to Ekigas STUN problem.
it affect also chain "Ekiga on Ubuntu using DSL"
--kapetr
___
ek
kapetr wrote:
Hello,
as asked by "Yannick Defais" ,
I have add twinkle log and wireshark output to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ekiga/+bug/517580
to comparison to Ekigas STUN problem.
it affect also chain "Ekiga on Ubuntu using DSL"
--kapetr
__
Le vendredi 26 février 2010 à 18:39 +0100, kapetr a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> as asked by "Yannick Defais" ,
> I have add twinkle log and wireshark output to
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ekiga/+bug/517580
>
> to comparison to Ekigas STUN problem.
>
> it affect also chain "Ekiga on
Le vendredi 26 février 2010 à 19:21 +0100, Damien Sandras a écrit :
> Le vendredi 26 février 2010 à 18:39 +0100, kapetr a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > as asked by "Yannick Defais" ,
> > I have add twinkle log and wireshark output to
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ekiga/+bug/5175
mat101 wrote:
>
> I have a DSL 302G D-link modem and I've been trying to get Ekiga voip
> working on ubuntu 8.10 without any luck, and I was wondering whether
> anyone might be able to solve this problem.
>
> I have tried setting NAT Rule Entries for various ip numbers I thought
> might be the
Hello,
Thank You very much, yanick, for detailed explanation.
Unfortunately, momentarily I don't understand it - probably my bad English
(and maybe I have "double take" :-).
yanick wrote
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:28:27 +0100
> From: yannick
> To: Ekiga mailing
16 matches
Mail list logo