Le vendredi 12 janvier 2007 à 10:38 -0800, George Boyd a écrit :
> I am considering changing over to the CVS version of Ekiga. Is 2.04
> going to be released soon, or is it worthwhile to go ahead and use the
> CVS version?
I would wait for 2.0.4. As soon as I have 2 minutes, I'll work on it.
--
Julien Puydt wrote:
> ael a écrit :
>
>>Initially there are 14 packets exchanged. This is while ekiga is
>>starting up. At this point attempted calls to, say [EMAIL PROTECTED], fail
>>usually with abnormal call termination.
>
>
> You mean ekiga wasn't registered yet to ekiga.net ?
No. Normally
Damien Sandras a écrit :
> [...]
Hello
>
> However, we are using Asterisk, and Asterisk allows setting codecs only
> for the SIP channel and not application by application, which is the
> problem.
>
Don't quiet understand the meaning of this. You can set codecs per user
or peer - eg 500 Ulaw/Al
Le samedi 13 janvier 2007 à 18:19 +0100, Daniel Huhardeaux a écrit :
> Damien Sandras a écrit :
> > [...]
> Hello
> >
> > However, we are using Asterisk, and Asterisk allows setting codecs only
> > for the SIP channel and not application by application, which is the
> > problem.
> >
> Don't quie
Hi,
Just thought I'd add my $0.02 on this. I have a set up of 3 machines (all
running Ekiga) and 1 hard phone running behind a single OpenWrt router.
To get this working I altered the port settings on Ekiga(s) using gconf-editor,
and enabled both STUN and Proxy (fwdnat2.pulver.net). I have set e
On Saturday 13 January 2007 09:41, Damien Sandras wrote:
> Le samedi 13 janvier 2007 à 18:19 +0100, Daniel Huhardeaux a écrit :
> > Damien Sandras a écrit :
> > > [...]
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > > However, we are using Asterisk, and Asterisk allows setting codecs only
> > > for the SIP channel and not
Simon Wood wrote:
> Hi, Just thought I'd add my $0.02 on this. I have a set up of 3
> machines (all running Ekiga) and 1 hard phone running behind a single
> OpenWrt router.
>
> To get this working I altered the port settings on Ekiga(s) using
> gconf-editor, and enabled both STUN and Proxy (fwdna
Hello.
I have just bought a web cam and am trying to get Ekiga working, but
without much success! As this is my first attempt at setting up 'web
chatting', I am very much a newbie. So sorry if this is a very basic
question.
When I run Ekiga, without even trying to connect, the TX/RX light on
Keith Powell wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have just bought a web cam and am trying to get Ekiga working, but
> without much success! As this is my first attempt at setting up 'web
> chatting', I am very much a newbie. So sorry if this is a very basic
> question.
>
> When I run Ekiga, without even try
Le samedi 13 janvier 2007 à 10:31 -0800, Remco Treffkorn a écrit :
> On Saturday 13 January 2007 09:41, Damien Sandras wrote:
> > Le samedi 13 janvier 2007 à 18:19 +0100, Daniel Huhardeaux a écrit :
> > > Damien Sandras a écrit :
> > > > [...]
> > >
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > > However, we are using A
Hello,
Le samedi 13 janvier 2007 à 19:06 +, Keith Powell a écrit :
> Hello.
>
> I have just bought a web cam and am trying to get Ekiga working, but
> without much success! As this is my first attempt at setting up 'web
> chatting', I am very much a newbie. So sorry if this is a very basic
On Saturday 13 January 2007 19:43, Damien Sandras wrote:
> > Start 6890
> > End 6900
Those are the ports you are using for amsn, Keith.
> > UDP 5060
> > TCP 1720
>
That big depends on the result of the NAT test. The FAQ tells you the
implications of each possible result.
Anne
pgp5thzlSsxuw.
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:41:19 +0100
Damien Sandras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, but 500 is not a SIP peer/user. 500 is a "local" extension that
> bridges to the Echo() application.
Ah, you call it in the dialing plan?
J.
--
"One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that,
Le samedi 13 janvier 2007 à 21:23 +0100, Jan Schampera a écrit :
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:41:19 +0100
> Damien Sandras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sure, but 500 is not a SIP peer/user. 500 is a "local" extension that
> > bridges to the Echo() application.
>
> Ah, you call it in the dialing p
>> The only thing I am getting is a "Remote user rejected call" error message.
>>
>>
> 1). Are You sure, You have iLBC codec enabled? (don't remember if that
> site accepts anything else).
That's right - iLBC was not enabled. After enabling it, the
results were the same as when getting a con
On Saturday 13 January 2007 11:41, Damien Sandras wrote:
> Le samedi 13 janvier 2007 à 10:31 -0800, Remco Treffkorn a écrit :
> > On Saturday 13 January 2007 09:41, Damien Sandras wrote:
> > > Le samedi 13 janvier 2007 à 18:19 +0100, Daniel Huhardeaux a écrit :
> > > > Damien Sandras a écrit :
> >
16 matches
Mail list logo