Damien Sandras wrote:
> Hi Maurizio,
>
>
> Not really, except if your NAT router is doing some silly things with
> the SIP PDUs.
>
> Can you post a -d 4 output somewhere ?
>
I dropped an e-mail to your address with the output. I didn't know where
to post them. I hope I didn't make a mistake..
Hi Damien
I have been pondering your request for assistance for a while and I
have come to the conclusion that I could devote some time to Ekiga,
which gives me much fun and pleasure. I will offer my assistance in
two areas:
1. I would like to see the H.263 video codec implemented as soon as
poss
Le lundi 05 mars 2007 à 02:11 +0100, Jorge Alfaiate a écrit :
> Sorry to come back to this problem!
> I just created a new ekiga.net account through the configuration druid
> and I still get the same answer - Registration failed (timeout). The
> same applies to the pc-to-phone account which worked
Hi Maurizio,
Le lundi 05 mars 2007 à 12:58 +0100, Maurizio Avogadro a écrit :
> Hi Damien
>
> I've made some tests with my laptop: I'm very disconcerted.
>
> With a 56k dialup connection I was able to hear back the echo of my
> voice calling any echo test service; connecting behind another NAT I
For quite some time I have been unable to use Ekiga on my FreeBSD
platforms because gatekeeper registration fails. I suspect this is an
error in the port to FreeBSD, but I have had a report of a similar
problem on a Linux systems, so it may be in Opal. I am pretty sure that
it is not a gatekeeper i
maillog: 03/03/2007-22:34:38(+0100): Damien Sandras types
> > Hi Damien , I am Niv , we met at fosdem.
> > you told me ekiga uses a separate sound device for alerting incoming
> > calls.
> > I decided to report an issue that is bugging me. When I try to hang-up
> > ekiga freezes and I must kill it.
ael wrote:
>
> And what sort of NAT did ekiga report?
>
> ael
>
"Cone NAT" in my home setup and "Limited ports NAT" in my office setup
(worst case).
While I could configure my office router in order to have a working SIP,
I can't do anything for my home setup (please make sure to read my
previou
Maurizio Avogadro wrote:
> W.P. wrote:
>>
>>
>> Unfortunately yes. With a NAT'ed connection you have to use STUN
>> (and/or) proxy.
>> Take a look at ekiga wiki.
>> W.P.
>>
> Of course I _did_ use STUN (stun.ekiga.net) when behind NAT.
And what sort of NAT did ekiga report?
ael
___
W.P. wrote:
>
>
> Unfortunately yes. With a NAT'ed connection you have to use STUN
> (and/or) proxy.
> Take a look at ekiga wiki.
> W.P.
>
Of course I _did_ use STUN (stun.ekiga.net) when behind NAT.
Mau
___
ekiga-list mailing list
ekiga-list@gnom
> You are still using the V4L plugin, you MUST have the V4L2 plugin.
>
> Please install the "libpt-plugins-v4l2" package, and then select in video
> preference the V4L2 plugins, then click on the icon to show your local webcam.
> So we can see a lot of debug.
Now using V4L2, the error message on t
>It seems that SIP works reliably only in presence of a direct web
>connection; any other configuration brings unpredictable results. Is
>this the expected behaviour?
>
>
Unfortunately yes. With a NAT'ed connection you have to use STUN
(and/or) proxy.
Take a look at ekiga wiki.
W.P.
___
Hi Damien
I've made some tests with my laptop: I'm very disconcerted.
With a 56k dialup connection I was able to hear back the echo of my
voice calling any echo test service; connecting behind another NAT I was
able to hear back my voice with [EMAIL PROTECTED] but neither
[EMAIL PROTECTED] nor [E
12 matches
Mail list logo
