On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Daniel Kochmański
wrote:
> I'm asking this question because we're considering making C99-supporting
> compiler as a dependency for ECL C backend.
>
> This will relieve us from writing backward-compatible workarounds for
> the older standard and will simplify the c
Daniel Kochmański
writes:
> I've got a question - does anyone really depend on a non-C99 compliant
> compiler?
C99 is 16 years old. I would feel it's rather safe to rely on it.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
“The factory of the future will have only t
Dear all,
I've got a question - does anyone really depend on a non-C99 compliant
compiler?
MSVC supports C99 from 2013 [1], GCC has complete support from 4.5 [2] (with
various bits earlier), TCC also has everything except complex numbers [3]
(what is on their TODO) and Clang has complete support
