On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 07:29:00 +0200
Daniel Kochmański wrote:
> Ok, it failed (just after sending an e-mail, it's good to know that
> Muprhy's law still works :-)).
A complete hang?
--
Matt
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 07:25:37 +0200
Daniel Kochmański wrote:
> btw, it doesn't hang on my machine (runs ~30m already, if it'll
> fail I'll let you know). Could you provide more details? (OS,
> *features*, number of cores etc.)
I also have been trying to reproduce it on NetBSD/amd64 with 4 cores i
Ok, it failed (just after sending an e-mail, it's good to know that
Muprhy's law still works :-)).
Daniel
Daniel Kochmański writes:
> Hello,
>
> that's probably my fault, sorry. I've migrated bugs manually and
> probably missed this one (I remember this bug! but can't find anywhere).
>
> I'm add
btw, it doesn't hang on my machine (runs ~30m already, if it'll
fail I'll let you know). Could you provide more details? (OS,
*features*, number of cores etc.)
Daniel
Daniel Kochmański writes:
> Hello,
>
> that's probably my fault, sorry. I've migrated bugs manually and
> probably missed this o
Hello,
that's probably my fault, sorry. I've migrated bugs manually and
probably missed this one (I remember this bug! but can't find anywhere).
I'm adding it to regression tests in repository, thanks! Yes, old
reports are unfortunately lost.
As a sienote, please use ecl-devel@common-lisp.net m
Hey,
I've utilized autotools sugestion. Your question is answered in second
volume of ECL Quarterly:
https://common-lisp.net/project/ecl/quarterly/volume2.html#orgheadline8
Regards,
Daniel
Jerry James writes:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Daniel Kochmański
> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> si
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Daniel Kochmański wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> since nothing serious came up, we are publishing a new release.
>
> Announcment:
> https://common-lisp.net/project/ecl/files/ecl-16.0.0-announcement.html
>
> Source distribution:
> https://common-lisp.net/project/ecl/files/e
