://review.whamcloud.com/8390
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3467
Reviewed-by: wangdi
Reviewed-by: Fan Yong
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_request.c| 1 +
.../lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h | 2
Old version of lustre (1.8) calculated RPC checksums differently,
but the compat code is no longer important since in-kernel
version of lustre is nto compatible with 1.8 lustre servers
(that are long deprecated too).
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include
Nobody should be using any fo the old lustre 1.8 era tools
anymore, so drop compatibility with those.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/dir.c | 58 --
.../staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_internal.h | 18 ---
2 files changed
These three patches remove support for code that is no longer needed.
Mostly ability to talk to old version of lustre clients and servers.
Oleg Drokin (3):
staging/lustre/ptlrpc: get rid of lustre 1.8 compatible checksums
staging/lustre: get rid of deprecaed acl mount option code
staging
This is long since unused code, so get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c | 19 ---
1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite
Hello!
On Sep 15, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On 09/14/15 18:41, gr...@linuxhacker.ru wrote:
>> Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/14605
>
> I'm confused why the patch found in this email doesn't match the patch I
> find when I click on the above link? Some of the patches in
On Sep 16, 2015, at 1:35 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:30:41PM -0400, gr...@linuxhacker.ru wrote:
>> From: Oleg Drokin
>>
>> Since the client can never be server, this is all dead code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
>> ---
&
Hello!
On Aug 7, 2014, at 11:49 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>
>> This is not a critical bug and in the worst case the code here may
>> cause miss of statistics counter increase.
>> This is why I think it is not worth to backport the patch at all.
> You are right, and if this is just for some r
On Aug 8, 2014, at 12:42 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 12:03:20AM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> On Aug 7, 2014, at 11:49 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is not a critical bug and in the wo
> Because maybe these stats preceed the introduction of perf and other
> tracing/debug tools? I don't know, it's really low down on the list of
> reasons why lustre can't be merged out of staging at the moment, you all
> have much bigger issues to address first.
I wonder what is the prioritized
On Aug 9, 2014, at 11:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 10:34:36AM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>>
>>> Because maybe these stats preceed the introduction of perf and other
>>> tracing/debug tools? I don't know, it's really low down
On Aug 11, 2014, at 9:58 PM, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>
> On Aug 10, 2014, at 12:34 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>> Very odd, with this patch applied, I now get a build warning:
>>
>> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/config.c: In function ‘lnet_parse_ip2nets’:
>> drivers/staging/
value is returned that is then checked
before we actually use ipaddrs.
Assign ipaddrs to NULL to quiet this.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/config.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/config.c
b/dr
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/11004
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4971
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger
Reviewed-by: wangdi
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
.../staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h| 1 +
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c | 50
aging/lustre/clio: reorder initialization in cl_req_alloc()
staging/lustre/llite: hold inode mutex around ll_setattr_raw()
Nathaniel Clark (1):
staging/lustre/llite: check for integer overflow in hsm user request
Oleg Drokin (3):
staging/lustre/llite: Fix integer overflow in ll_fid2path
l
: Andreas Dilger
Reviewed-by: John L. Hammond
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
.../lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_user.h | 23 +-
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/dir.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging
iewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/11167
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5389
Reviewed-by: John L. Hammond
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c | 34 ++
.../staging/lustre/lustre/
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5290
Reviewed-by: Bobi Jam
Reviewed-by: Jinshan Xiong
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdcla
wed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/10956
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5291
Reviewed-by: Bobi Jam
Reviewed-by: Jinshan Xiong
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_internal.h | 4
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_mmap.c |
eviewed-by: Lai Siyao
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c
index c64a38e..d02bf31 100644
--- a/drivers/stag
Reported by Dan Carpenter
outsize = sizeof(*gfout) + gfin->gf_pathlen;
Where outsize is int and gf_pathlen is u32 from userspace
can lead to integer overflowwhere outsize is some small number
less than sizeof(*gfout)
Add a check for pathlen to be of sensical size.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Dro
shan Xiong
Reviewed-by: Faccini Bruno
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c
index fd1b75a3..084fb92 100644
---
This adds Documentation/filesystems/lustre.txt with some
basic information about Lustre and how to use it.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
Documentation/filesystems/lustre.txt | 87
1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation
Just add the entry with some info.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
MAINTAINERS | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 7e2eb4c..369183b 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -8646,6 +8646,14 @@ W: http://www.lirc.org/
S: Odd
f our userspace
tools include it), hopefully that's still ok, though?
More of this sort of patches will follow after we make sure
of the correctness of the end result.
Oleg Drokin (2):
staging/lustre: get rid of seqno_t and mdsno_t typedefs
staging/lustre: get rid of obd_* typedefs
drive
We have a bunch of typedefs for common things that made no sense
and hid the actual type from plain view.
Replace them with proper uXX or sXX types.
Exception is in lustre_idl.h where
they are replaced with __uXX and __sXX to be able to be included
in userspace
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
seqno_t is u64 and mdsno_t is u32 so just use them as such.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fid/fid_request.c | 6 +++---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_cache.c| 16
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_internal.h
On Aug 17, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:48:14PM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>> Just add the entry with some info.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
>> ---
>> MAINTAINERS | 8
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertio
On Aug 17, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:48:15PM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>> This adds Documentation/filesystems/lustre.txt with some
>> basic information about Lustre and how to use it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oleg Drok
This adds drivers/staging/lustre/README.txt with some
basic information about Lustre and how to use it.
Eventually this will need to move to Documentation/filesystems/lustre.txt
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
drivers/staging/lustre/README.txt | 87 +++
1
> On Feb 8, 2018, at 8:39 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 16 2016, James Simmons wrote:
my that’s an old patch
>
>>
>> +static inline bool
>> +lsm_md_eq(const struct lmv_stripe_md *lsm1, const struct lmv_stripe_md
>> *lsm2)
>> +{
>> +int idx;
>> +
>> +if (lsm1->lsm_md_magic !=
> On Feb 8, 2018, at 10:10 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 08 2018, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>
>>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 8:39 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 16 2016, James Simmons wrote:
>>
>> my that’s an old patch
>>
>>
> On Feb 11, 2018, at 6:50 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> Maybe - as you suggest in another email - it is due to some
> client/server incompatibility. I guess it is unavoidable with an fs
> like lustre to have incompatible protocol changes. Is there any
> mechanism for detecting the version of other
> On Feb 11, 2018, at 6:44 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 08 2018, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>>
>> Certain things that sound useless (like the debug subsystem in Lustre)
>> is very useful when you have a 10k nodes in a cluster and need to selectively
>>
401 - 434 of 434 matches
Mail list logo
