d9 ("MIPS: Octeon: Remove usage of cvmx_wait() everywhere.")
> Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen
Reviewed-by: James Hogan
Should this driver be enabled in the MIPS cavium_octeon_defconfig or
should that not happen until the driver comes out of staging?
Cheers
James
> ---
>
eon_cvmemctl {
> /* R/W Size of local memory in cache blocks, 54 (6912
>* bytes) is max legal value. */
> __BITFIELD_FIELD(uint64_t lmemsz:6,
> - ;)
> + ;
> } s;
> };
Regardless, the patch l
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 04:55:35PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> From: Carlos Munoz
>
> Add a global resource manager to manage tagged pointers within
> bootmem allocated memory. This is used by various functional
> blocks in the Octeon core like the FPA, Ethernet nexus, etc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ca
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 01:49:43PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> On 11/30/2017 01:36 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 04:55:34PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Carlos Munoz
> >> Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill
> >> Signed-off-b
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 03:09:33PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> On 11/30/2017 02:56 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 01:49:43PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> >> On 11/30/2017 01:36 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 04:55
Hi Chen,
On 19/01/14 10:07, Chen Gang wrote:
> BTW: this patch is related with another patch which is discussing (so I
> have cc that patch to you and Greg too): "if we could sure that it is a
> compiler's feature issue, we will skip this patch".
If you're referring to the #pragma pack portabilit
On 20/01/14 12:30, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Ah. From so metag is a new arch and not a compiler like the changelog
> says.
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:56:47AM +, James Hogan wrote:
>> struct a {
>> struct b {
>> unsigned int x;
>>
On 20/01/14 13:01, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> It would be easy enough to make the compiler complain about any union
> which would normally have size which is not a multiple of 4.
>
> Warning: union will be padded with 2 bytes unless __attribute__((packed)).
>
> Otherwise you will be fighting this for
Hi Dan,
On 20/01/14 21:13, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I made a quick and dirty sparse patch to check for this. I don't think
> I will bother trying to send it to sparse upstream, but you can if you
> want to.
>
> It found 289 unions which might need a __packed added. The lustre
> unions were not in
On 03/02/14 10:05, David Laight wrote:
> From: Dan Carpenter
>> On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 09:57:39PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> It seems, our kernel still stick to treate 'pack' region have effect
>>> with both 'align' and 'sizeof'.
>>
>> It's not about packed regions. It's about unions. It's sayi
On 03/02/14 10:35, David Laight wrote:
> From: James Hogan
>> On 03/02/14 10:05, David Laight wrote:
>>> Architectures that define such alignment rules are a right PITA.
>>> You either need to get the size to 2 without using 'packed', or
>>> just not
safe syscalls.
...
> arch/mips/include/asm/compat.h| 11 ---
> arch/mips/kernel/signal32.c | 2 +-
For MIPS:
Acked-by: James Hogan
Cheers
James
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
devel mailing
12 matches
Mail list logo
