hat initial commit or apply something like
the attached patch as a quick fix.
>From ecbf154d15f4022676219b9ff90e542d1db64392 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:11:27 +0200
Subject: sd: set a non-zero timeout for flush requests
rq->timeout for TYPE_FS
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:51:06AM +, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
wrote:
> SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (16) should be favored over SYNCHRONIZE
> CACHE (10) unless SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (10) is not supported.
I gues you mean (16) for the last occurance? What's the benefit of
using SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (
401 - 402 of 402 matches
Mail list logo
