This is already present in staging-next (see [1] and [2])
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git/commit/drivers/staging/wilc1000?h=staging-next&id=8692b047e86cff448af1564a8bdda770d2deb567
[2]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git/commi
Now I see that your patch is for SPI interface, so, it may be necessary.
Sorry for the noise.
On 17.09.2019 10:11, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> This is already present in staging-next (see [1] and [2])
>
> [1]
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git/commit/
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 03:38:48PM -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 04:11:00PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 03:47:28PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Okash Khawaja, le dim. 15 sept. 2019 19:41:30 +0100, a ecrit:
> > > > I have attached the d
On 17/09/2019 07:33, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 09:41:43PM -0500, Navid Emamdoost wrote:
In das1800_attach, the buffer allocated via kmalloc_array needs to be
released if an error happens.
Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost
Commedit calls ->detach() if the ->attach() fails so t
From: Aliasgar Surti
coccicheck reported warning for unneeded variable used.
This patch removes the unneeded variables.
Signed-off-by: Aliasgar Surti
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c | 15 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:01:31PM +0530, Aliasgar Surti wrote:
> From: Aliasgar Surti
>
> coccicheck reported warning for unneeded variable used.
>
> This patch removes the unneeded variables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aliasgar Surti
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c | 15 +
Sir,
This is to let you know that your payment file has been brought to this
committee for the final decision to be made.
From all observations made in your file concerning this payment, we have
reached a conclusion of assisting you in making sure that you receive
this payment.
There are
Commit c440eee1a7a1 ("Staging: fbtft: Switch to the gpio descriptor
interface") removed setting gpios via platform data. This means that
fbtft will now only work with Device Tree so set the dependency.
This also prevents a NULL pointer deref on non-DT platform because
fbtftops.request_gpios is not
Commit c440eee1a7a1 ("Staging: fbtft: Switch to the gpio descriptor
interface") removed the gpio code from fbtft_device rendering it useless.
fbtft_device is a module that was used on the Raspberry Pi to dynamically
add fbtft devices when the Pi didn't have Device Tree support.
Just remove the mod
flexfb was an attempt to write a generic fbtft driver that was abandoned.
All the displays it supports are supported by other fbtft drivers.
Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes
---
drivers/staging/fbtft/Kconfig | 6 -
drivers/staging/fbtft/Makefile | 1 -
drivers/staging/fbtft/flexfb.c | 851
Add SPDX identifier to Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Michael Straube
---
drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig
index 290dbfc7ace1..59e07afe249c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig
+++ b/dri
Ah it looks like the spaces after Description: need to be converted into tabs.
Thanks,
Okash
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:35 PM Okash Khawaja wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> You're right, I got none of those emails. Thanks. Is it all taken care of?
>
> Best regards,
> Okash
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 4:5
In ipipe_g_config the allocated memory for params needs to be released
if either module_if->get or copy_to_user fails.
Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost
---
drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_ipipe.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/media
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:01:18AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 03:38:48PM -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 04:11:00PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 03:47:28PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > Okash Khawaja,
Hi Adham,
On 9/17/19 9:03 AM, adham.aboza...@microchip.com wrote:
On 9/16/19 5:49 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[cannot apply to v5.3 next-20190916]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
This
I've summarized some of the big differences between sdfat and exfat
in linux-next.
1. sdfat has been refactored to improve compatibility, readability and
to be linux friendly.(included support mass storages larger than 2TB.)
2. sdfat has been optimized for the performance of SD-cards.
- Support
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 05:44:32PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:01:31PM +0530, Aliasgar Surti wrote:
> > From: Aliasgar Surti
> >
> > coccicheck reported warning for unneeded variable used.
> >
> > This patch removes the unneeded variables.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ali
A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post
Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
A: No.
Q: Should I includ
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:03:53PM -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:01:18AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 03:38:48PM -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 04:11:00PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2
On (09/18/19 08:16), 'Greg KH' wrote:
[..]
> > Note, that Samsung is still improving sdfat driver. For instance,
> > what will be realeased soon is sdfat v2.3.0, which will include support
> > for "UtcOffset" of "File Directory Entry", in order to satisfy
> > exFAT specification 7.4.
>
[..]
> If Sa
20 matches
Mail list logo
