This series of patches look good for me, thanks for the clean up
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Gaignard
2016-08-08 18:52 GMT+02:00 Laura Abbott :
> I never saw any feedback or action on these patches so this is a resend.
> Probably hit the window when everyone was busy/traveling.
>
> ---
>
> Hi,
>
> Thi
> It's a sparse defect.
>
> Try again after patching sparse with Jes' patch:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-sparse&m=147091200720267&w=3
Mine, not Jes's ;-)
But there's another patch going into the kernel to fix it:
https://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/byteswap-dont-use-__builtin_bswap-w
On Sat, 2016-08-13 at 17:26 +0800, sunbing wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2016, at 22:30, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> > sunbing writes:
> > > On Aug 11, 2016, at 23:25, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> > > > Bing Sun writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixed sparse parse error:
> > > > > Expected constant expression in case stat
On Sun, 2016-08-14 at 14:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >
> > It's a sparse defect.
> >
> > Try again after patching sparse with Jes' patch:
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-sparse&m=147091200720267&w=3
> Mine, not Jes's ;-)
Right, sorry 'bout that.
> But there's another patch going into the ker
From: Stephen Hemminger
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 11:35:59 -0700
> This is how I think it should be fixed, but not tested yet.
>
> Subjec: netvsc: use device not module reference counts
>
> Fix how the cross-device reference counting is handled. When VF is
> associated with the synthetic interfac
On Sun, 2016-08-14 at 05:23 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> Maybe this test should be sparse version checked after
> sparse is updated.
*If* sparse ever gets updated :) I don't think it's been updated much
lately.
That said, I'm not even sure how, and what version, etc. so obviously
that'd have to