Re: Which SPDX Identifier for files without explicit GPL version

2018-10-28 Thread Michael Straube
On 10/28/18 3:13 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:22:40PM +0100, Michael Straube wrote: On 10/28/18 12:27 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 11:04:06AM +0100, Michael Straube wrote: Hi, which GPL version should be used in SPDX Identifiers for files t

Re: Which SPDX Identifier for files without explicit GPL version

2018-10-28 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:22:40PM +0100, Michael Straube wrote: > On 10/28/18 12:27 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 11:04:06AM +0100, Michael Straube wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > which GPL version should be used in SPDX Identifiers for files that > > > are GPL licensed b

Re: Which SPDX Identifier for files without explicit GPL version

2018-10-28 Thread Michael Straube
On 10/28/18 12:27 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 11:04:06AM +0100, Michael Straube wrote: Hi, which GPL version should be used in SPDX Identifiers for files that are GPL licensed but do not mention any version? It is not clear to me after reading license-rules.rst. For e

Re: Which SPDX Identifier for files without explicit GPL version

2018-10-28 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 11:04:06AM +0100, Michael Straube wrote: > Hi, > > which GPL version should be used in SPDX Identifiers for files that > are GPL licensed but do not mention any version? It is not clear to > me after reading license-rules.rst. > > For example: > > /***