On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:11:37AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I mean, yes, it doesn't seem to make much sense to continue polling
> after all the hardware has been removed. The problem is that we pass a
> pci_dev pointer to dgap_remove_one() and it ignores it and removes
> everything.
>
> Othe
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:11:37AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> Also this driver has active maintainers but somehow we have CC'd the
> ATMEL people who maintain a different staging driver...
The original patch had put the maintainers of WILC1000 WIFI DRIVER in the
cc list. Now ccing the actual
I mean, yes, it doesn't seem to make much sense to continue polling
after all the hardware has been removed. The problem is that we pass a
pci_dev pointer to dgap_remove_one() and it ignores it and removes
everything.
Otherwise, I would probably suggest that it start polling when the first
hardwa
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 04:54:47AM +, Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.)
wrote:
> From: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango
>
> @@ -7159,8 +7144,9 @@ err_stop:
> */
> static void dgap_cleanup_module(void)
> {
> - if (dgap_numboards)
> - pci_unregister_driver(&dgap_driver);
> +
