A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:05:27AM -0400, Michael Shuey wrote:
> Ah - that explains it. I added additional files to the series, but
> simply re-applied the original round of patches. They would've not
Ah - that explains it. I added additional files to the series, but
simply re-applied the original round of patches. They would've not
been tagged as v4, while the patches pertaining to the newly-modified
files had v4 in the subject.
I'll be more thorough in future patch revisions. Thanks for th
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 08:09:54AM -0400, Michael Shuey wrote:
> BTW, you keep mentioning a v5 that I sent. Where is that, exactly?
> The last round of patches I sent I've kept labeled as "PATCH v4", and
> I only hit git send-email once. Could you forward me something from
> this v5 series, so I
Hm, that's unfortunate - but my own fault for lack of proper
etiquette. I'll give this a week or two to settle, and build up
patches against other parts of lustre in the meantime.
BTW, you keep mentioning a v5 that I sent. Where is that, exactly?
The last round of patches I sent I've kept labele
We would have applied the v3 patchset but now I don't know because we're
up to v5. We can't apply v5 because there are problems with it. No
one responded to v3 so Greg still might apply it or he might find these
email threads too scrambled and delete everything and ask for a resend.
It's pretty
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:50:23PM -0400, Mike Shuey wrote:
> This patch series cleans up code in staging/lustre/lnet - mostly spacing
> and dead function cleanup. Should apply against linux-next 20150518.
Why are you sending a v4 of this? We don't actually enjoy reviewing the
same patchset over
