On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:46:12PM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Dan Carpenter
> wrote:
> > Give it a shot and see if the warnings go away. I don't think the tag
> > is correct.
>
> Just removing __iomem tag in shmem_data field of slic_shmemory struct
> mak
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Dan Carpenter
wrote:
> Give it a shot and see if the warnings go away. I don't think the tag
> is correct.
Just removing __iomem tag in shmem_data field of slic_shmemory struct
makes sparse happy. No warnings around.
Should I send a v4 patch with the tag remove
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:22:00PM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Dan Carpenter
> wrote:
> > Hm... I seem to duplicate the Sparse warnings at all. That's weird.
> >
>
> With this patch applied, sparse warnings dissapear for me... That's weird.
>
I understa
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Dan Carpenter
wrote:
> Hm... I seem to duplicate the Sparse warnings at all. That's weird.
>
With this patch applied, sparse warnings dissapear for me... That's weird.
> Anyway as far as I can tell the warnings are false positives... Can't
> you just remove t
Hm... I seem to duplicate the Sparse warnings at all. That's weird.
Anyway as far as I can tell the warnings are false positives... Can't
you just remove the __iomem tag? Have you tested this change?
regards,
dan carpenter
___
devel mailing list
de
