Hi Chuhong,
many thanks for the patch.
On Tue 15 Oct 2019 at 14:59, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
> devm_regulator_get may return an error but mipi_csis_phy_init misses
> a check for it.
> This may lead to problems when regulator_set_voltage uses the unchecked
> pointer.
> This patch adds a check for devm_r
Hi Marco,
On Thu 17 Oct 2019 at 09:10, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Hi Rui,
>
> On 19-10-16 14:43, Rui Miguel Silva wrote:
>> Hi Marco,
>> On Wed 16 Oct 2019 at 10:06, Marco Felsch wrote:
>> > Hi Chuhong,
>> >
>> > On 19-10-15 21:59, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
>> >> devm_regulator_get may return an error but mip
Hi Rui,
On 19-10-16 14:43, Rui Miguel Silva wrote:
> Hi Marco,
> On Wed 16 Oct 2019 at 10:06, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Hi Chuhong,
> >
> > On 19-10-15 21:59, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
> >> devm_regulator_get may return an error but mipi_csis_phy_init misses
> >> a check for it.
> >> This may lead to prob
Hi Marco,
On Wed 16 Oct 2019 at 10:06, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Hi Chuhong,
>
> On 19-10-15 21:59, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
>> devm_regulator_get may return an error but mipi_csis_phy_init misses
>> a check for it.
>> This may lead to problems when regulator_set_voltage uses the unchecked
>> pointer.
>> Th
Hi Chuhong,
On 19-10-15 21:59, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
> devm_regulator_get may return an error but mipi_csis_phy_init misses
> a check for it.
> This may lead to problems when regulator_set_voltage uses the unchecked
> pointer.
> This patch adds a check for devm_regulator_get to avoid potential risk.
