Thank you.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:13 AM, H Hartley Sweeten
wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 10:06 AM, Shaun Laing wrote:
>> Ok,
>>
>> 1) I'm unclear as to the process at this point: should I re-send this patch
>> with the suggested change?
>
> Yes. Please repost the patch with the prefix
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 10:06 AM, Shaun Laing wrote:
> Ok,
>
> 1) I'm unclear as to the process at this point: should I re-send this patch
> with the suggested change?
Yes. Please repost the patch with the prefix changed to [PATCH v2].
Make sure to add Ian's Reviewed-by tag to the patch. You c
On 2013/07/30 04:07 PM, Shaun Laing wrote:
> Resolves warnings from the "sparse" checker of the form "warning: incorrect
> type in assignment (different base types)".
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaun Laing
Okay, but we have two patches with the same subject line (apart from the
"[PATCH]" prefix missing
