On 2015-05-06 03:09 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:05:55AM -0400, nick wrote:
>> On 2015-05-06 05:10 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
>>> On 06/05/15 01:22, nick wrote:
Greetings All,
I am wondering if in the function,ni_stc_dma_channel_select_bitfield the
line:
return
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:05:55AM -0400, nick wrote:
> On 2015-05-06 05:10 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
> > On 06/05/15 01:22, nick wrote:
> >> Greetings All,
> >> I am wondering if in the function,ni_stc_dma_channel_select_bitfield the
> >> line:
> >> return 1 << channel;
> >> is guaranteed to be below
On Wednesday, May 06, 2015 7:06 AM, nick wrote:
> On 2015-05-06 05:10 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
>> On 06/05/15 01:22, nick wrote:
>>> Greetings All,
>>> I am wondering if in the function,ni_stc_dma_channel_select_bitfield the
>>> line:
>>> return 1 << channel;
>>> is guaranteed to be below the thresho
On 2015-05-06 05:10 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 06/05/15 01:22, nick wrote:
>> Greetings All,
>> I am wondering if in the function,ni_stc_dma_channel_select_bitfield the
>> line:
>> return 1 << channel;
>> is guaranteed to be below the threshold that guarantees us to not overflow on
>> a unsigned
On 06/05/15 01:22, nick wrote:
Greetings All,
I am wondering if in the function,ni_stc_dma_channel_select_bitfield the line:
return 1 << channel;
is guaranteed to be below the threshold that guarantees us to not overflow on
a unsigned 32 integer due to bit wise shifting to the left.
Thanks Nick
