On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:08:08PM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Mitch Harder
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:13:02PM +0800, Michael wang wrote:
> >>> Hi, Mitch
> >>>
> >>> On 08/17/
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Mitch Harder
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:13:02PM +0800, Michael wang wrote:
>>> Hi, Mitch
>>>
>>> On 08/17/2013 10:01 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
>>> > I'm encountering a BUG while using a ZR
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:13:02PM +0800, Michael wang wrote:
>> Hi, Mitch
>>
>> On 08/17/2013 10:01 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
>> > I'm encountering a BUG while using a ZRAM Swap device.
>> >
>> > The call trace seems to involve the c
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:13:02PM +0800, Michael wang wrote:
> Hi, Mitch
>
> On 08/17/2013 10:01 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
> > I'm encountering a BUG while using a ZRAM Swap device.
> >
> > The call trace seems to involve the changes recently added to 3.10.6
> > by the patch:
> > zram: use
Hi, Mitch
On 08/17/2013 10:01 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
> I'm encountering a BUG while using a ZRAM Swap device.
>
> The call trace seems to involve the changes recently added to 3.10.6
> by the patch:
> zram: use zram->lock to protect zram_free_page() in swap free notify path
>
> The hardware is