> > > > >
> > > > > If Doug accepts the library changes, let me know that public git
> > > > > commit
> > > > > and I can pull it into the staging-next branch and you can continue to
> > > > > send me staging patches that way.
> > > >
> > > > Won't this cause a conflict during the merge window?
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 06:27:57PM -0800, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:15:08PM -0500, ira.weiny wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:01:48PM -0800, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
[snip]
> > >
> > > No, git is good :)
> > >
> > > > How do we handle changes w
On 12/22/2015 09:27 PM, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:15:08PM -0500, ira.weiny wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:01:48PM -0800, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 07:19:43PM -0500, ira.weiny wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:02:35P
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:15:08PM -0500, ira.weiny wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:01:48PM -0800, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 07:19:43PM -0500, ira.weiny wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:02:35PM -0800, gre...@linuxfoundation.org
> > > wrote:
> > > > On
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:01:48PM -0800, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 07:19:43PM -0500, ira.weiny wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:02:35PM -0800, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:12:14AM -0500, ira.weiny wrote:
> > > > Greg, Dou
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 07:19:43PM -0500, ira.weiny wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:02:35PM -0800, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:12:14AM -0500, ira.weiny wrote:
> > > Greg, Doug,
> > >
> > > As mentioned below, these patches depend on the new rdmavt library
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:02:35PM -0800, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:12:14AM -0500, ira.weiny wrote:
> > Greg, Doug,
> >
> > As mentioned below, these patches depend on the new rdmavt library
> > submitted to
> > Doug on linux-rdma.
> >
> > We continue to iden
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:12:14AM -0500, ira.weiny wrote:
> Greg, Doug,
>
> As mentioned below, these patches depend on the new rdmavt library submitted
> to
> Doug on linux-rdma.
>
> We continue to identify (and rework) patches by our other developers which can
> be submitted without conflicts
Greg, Doug,
As mentioned below, these patches depend on the new rdmavt library submitted to
Doug on linux-rdma.
We continue to identify (and rework) patches by our other developers which can
be submitted without conflicts with this series. Furthermore, We have, as much
as possible, placed fixes
This patch series is being submitted as a Request For Comment only. It depends
on code submitted to the rdma subsystem [1].
This work is the first submission aimed to satisfy the TODO item for removing
duplicated code in hfi1. At the time of submission hfi1 and qib contained alot
of duplicated ver
10 matches
Mail list logo