Re: [RFC] errno.h: Provide EFSCORRUPTED for everybody

2019-11-05 Thread Dave Chinner
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 04:15:50PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 08:38:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 09:57:31PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > Hi Valdis, > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:11 AM Valdis Kletnieks > > > wrote: > > > >

Re: [RFC] errno.h: Provide EFSCORRUPTED for everybody

2019-11-05 Thread David Sterba
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 08:38:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 09:57:31PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Valdis, > > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:11 AM Valdis Kletnieks > > wrote: > > > Three questions: (a) ACK/NAK on this patch, (b) should it be all in one > >

Re: [RFC] errno.h: Provide EFSCORRUPTED for everybody

2019-11-01 Thread Dave Chinner
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 09:57:31PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Valdis, > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:11 AM Valdis Kletnieks > wrote: > > Three questions: (a) ACK/NAK on this patch, (b) should it be all in one > > patch, or one to add to errno.h and 6 patches for 6 filesystems?), and > >

Re: [RFC] errno.h: Provide EFSCORRUPTED for everybody

2019-11-01 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Valdis, On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:11 AM Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > Three questions: (a) ACK/NAK on this patch, (b) should it be all in one > patch, or one to add to errno.h and 6 patches for 6 filesystems?), and > (c) if one patch, who gets to shepherd it through? > > There's currently 6 filesy

Re: [RFC] errno.h: Provide EFSCORRUPTED for everybody

2019-10-31 Thread Theodore Y. Ts'o
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 09:07:33PM -0400, Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > Three questions: (a) ACK/NAK on this patch, (b) should it be all in one > patch, or one to add to errno.h and 6 patches for 6 filesystems?), and > (c) if one patch, who gets to shepherd it through? Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o ___

Re: [RFC] errno.h: Provide EFSCORRUPTED for everybody

2019-10-31 Thread Jan Kara
On Wed 30-10-19 21:07:33, Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > Three questions: (a) ACK/NAK on this patch, (b) should it be all in one > patch, or one to add to errno.h and 6 patches for 6 filesystems?), and > (c) if one patch, who gets to shepherd it through? > > > There's currently 6 filesystems that have

Re: [RFC] errno.h: Provide EFSCORRUPTED for everybody

2019-10-30 Thread Valdis Klētnieks
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 20:04:49 -0700, "Darrick J. Wong" said: > I would add (d) can we do the same to EFSBADCRC, seeing as f2fs, > ext4, xfs, and jbd2 all define it the same way? If this one flies, that's a good candidate for a second patch pgpCNp_PdIQvD.pgp Description: PGP signature ___

Re: [RFC] errno.h: Provide EFSCORRUPTED for everybody

2019-10-30 Thread Darrick J. Wong
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 09:07:33PM -0400, Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > Three questions: (a) ACK/NAK on this patch, Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong > (b) should it be all in one patch, or one to add to errno.h and 6 > patches for 6 filesystems?), and I don't particularly care, but I've a slight preferenc

[RFC] errno.h: Provide EFSCORRUPTED for everybody

2019-10-30 Thread Valdis Kletnieks
Three questions: (a) ACK/NAK on this patch, (b) should it be all in one patch, or one to add to errno.h and 6 patches for 6 filesystems?), and (c) if one patch, who gets to shepherd it through? There's currently 6 filesystems that have the same #define. Move it into errno.h so it's defined in jus