Hi Janusz,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on gpio/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.19-rc2 next-20180905]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/
Hi Janusz,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on gpio/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.19-rc2 next-20180831]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-c
Hi Janusz,
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 2:01 PM Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Most users of get/set array functions iterate consecutive bits of data,
> usually a single integer, while processing array of results obtained
> from, or building an array of values to be passed to those functions.
> Save time
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 6:31 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > +++ b/drivers/auxdisplay/hd44780.c
> > @@ -62,17 +62,12 @@ static void hd44780_strobe_gpio(struct hd44780 *hd)
> > /* write to an LCD panel register in 8 bit GPIO mode */
> > static void hd44780_write_gpio8(struct hd44780 *hd, u8 val, unsi
> +++ b/drivers/auxdisplay/hd44780.c
> @@ -62,17 +62,12 @@ static void hd44780_strobe_gpio(struct hd44780 *hd)
> /* write to an LCD panel register in 8 bit GPIO mode */
> static void hd44780_write_gpio8(struct hd44780 *hd, u8 val, unsigned int rs)
> {
> - int values[10]; /* for DATA[0-7], RS
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 02:01:41PM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ static long linehandle_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsigned
> int cmd,
>
> /* Clamp all values to [0,1] */
> for (i = 0; i < lh->numdescs; i++)
> - vals[i] = !!
Most users of get/set array functions iterate consecutive bits of data,
usually a single integer, while processing array of results obtained
from, or building an array of values to be passed to those functions.
Save time wasted on those iterations by changing the functions' API to
accept bitmaps.
