On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:24:27 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 27 May 2017 20:43:58 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov
> > wrote:
> > > Max virtual processor will be needed for 'extended' hypercalls supporting
> > > more than 64 vCPUs.
On Sat, 27 May 2017 20:43:58 +0300
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > Max virtual processor will be needed for 'extended' hypercalls supporting
> > more than 64 vCPUs. While on it, unify on 'Hyper-V' in mshyperv.c as we
> > currently have a mix,
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Max virtual processor will be needed for 'extended' hypercalls supporting
> more than 64 vCPUs. While on it, unify on 'Hyper-V' in mshyperv.c as we
> currently have a mix, report acquired misc features as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Ku
Max virtual processor will be needed for 'extended' hypercalls supporting
more than 64 vCPUs. While on it, unify on 'Hyper-V' in mshyperv.c as we
currently have a mix, report acquired misc features as well.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov
Acked-by: K. Y. Srinivasan
Tested-by: Simon Xiao
Tested-