Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of virtual/logical processor

2017-06-05 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:24:27 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Sat, 27 May 2017 20:43:58 +0300 > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov > > wrote: > > > Max virtual processor will be needed for 'extended' hypercalls supporting > > > more than 64 vCPUs.

Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of virtual/logical processor

2017-06-05 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sat, 27 May 2017 20:43:58 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > Max virtual processor will be needed for 'extended' hypercalls supporting > > more than 64 vCPUs. While on it, unify on 'Hyper-V' in mshyperv.c as we > > currently have a mix,

Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of virtual/logical processor

2017-05-27 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Max virtual processor will be needed for 'extended' hypercalls supporting > more than 64 vCPUs. While on it, unify on 'Hyper-V' in mshyperv.c as we > currently have a mix, report acquired misc features as well. > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Ku

[PATCH v4 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of virtual/logical processor

2017-05-24 Thread Vitaly Kuznetsov
Max virtual processor will be needed for 'extended' hypercalls supporting more than 64 vCPUs. While on it, unify on 'Hyper-V' in mshyperv.c as we currently have a mix, report acquired misc features as well. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Acked-by: K. Y. Srinivasan Tested-by: Simon Xiao Tested-