Re: [PATCH v4] imx-drm: Fix probe failure

2013-09-25 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:20:22PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > >> Greg, > >> > >> The offending commit that causes the regression is in 3.12-rc1 now, so this > >> patch could go via your staging tree. > > > > Thanks for this, I'l

Re: [PATCH v4] imx-drm: Fix probe failure

2013-09-25 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Greg, On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> Greg, >> >> The offending commit that causes the regression is in 3.12-rc1 now, so this >> patch could go via your staging tree. > > Thanks for this, I'll take it now. Do you think this one can reach 3.12-rc3? Thanks, Fabio Estevam _

Re: [PATCH v4] imx-drm: Fix probe failure

2013-09-17 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 02:53:23PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Since commit b5dc0d10 (drm/imx: kill firstopen callback) the following probe > failure is seen: > > [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 1 (10.10.2010). > [drm] No driver support for vblank timestamp query. > [drm] Initialized

[PATCH v4] imx-drm: Fix probe failure

2013-09-17 Thread Fabio Estevam
Since commit b5dc0d10 (drm/imx: kill firstopen callback) the following probe failure is seen: [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 1 (10.10.2010). [drm] No driver support for vblank timestamp query. [drm] Initialized imx-drm 1.0.0 20120507 on minor 0 imx-ldb ldb.10: adding encoder failed wi