Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] staging: iio: isl29018: check if the chip is in a suspended state

2016-10-01 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 01/10/16 16:30, Brian Masney wrote: > On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 02:59:49PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> On 27/09/16 01:20, Brian Masney wrote: >>> Add a check to isl29018_write_raw() to ensure that the chip is not in a >>> suspended state. This makes the code consistent with what is present >

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] staging: iio: isl29018: check if the chip is in a suspended state

2016-10-01 Thread Brian Masney
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 02:59:49PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 27/09/16 01:20, Brian Masney wrote: > > Add a check to isl29018_write_raw() to ensure that the chip is not in a > > suspended state. This makes the code consistent with what is present > > in isl29018_read_raw(). > > > > Signed

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] staging: iio: isl29018: check if the chip is in a suspended state

2016-10-01 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 27/09/16 01:20, Brian Masney wrote: > Add a check to isl29018_write_raw() to ensure that the chip is not in a > suspended state. This makes the code consistent with what is present > in isl29018_read_raw(). > > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git. Out of curios

[PATCH v3 5/5] staging: iio: isl29018: check if the chip is in a suspended state

2016-09-26 Thread Brian Masney
Add a check to isl29018_write_raw() to ensure that the chip is not in a suspended state. This makes the code consistent with what is present in isl29018_read_raw(). Signed-off-by: Brian Masney --- drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29018.c | 7 ++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) d