Re: [PATCH v3] Provide USF for the portable equipment.

2020-08-05 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 11:17:28AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Sending updated patchset for this isn't going to help you my friend. You need > people (maintainers) to agree on the idea here first. It doesn't take much work to make the code look nice. Writing pretty code is always a good idea bec

Re: [PATCH v3] Provide USF for the portable equipment.

2020-08-04 Thread Greg KH
A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? A: No. Q: Should I includ

Re: [PATCH v3] Provide USF for the portable equipment.

2020-08-03 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 03-08-20, 22:31, Dongdong Yang wrote: > From: Dongdong Yang > > This patch provides USF(User Sensitive Feedback factor) auxiliary > cpufreq governor to support high level layer sysfs inodes setting > for utils adjustment purpose from the identified scenario on portable > equipment. Because the

[PATCH v3] Provide USF for the portable equipment.

2020-08-03 Thread Dongdong Yang
From: Dongdong Yang This patch provides USF(User Sensitive Feedback factor) auxiliary cpufreq governor to support high level layer sysfs inodes setting for utils adjustment purpose from the identified scenario on portable equipment. Because the power consumption and UI response are more cared for