Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] staging: cxt1e1: remove unneeded a value

2014-03-06 Thread DaeSeok Youn
Ok. I will fix it and send again. Thanks. Daeseok Youn 2014-03-07 4:58 GMT+09:00 Greg KH : > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 05:12:48PM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote: >> >> It doesn't need to assign name array address to np pointer. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn >> --- >> v2: replace sprintf() with snpr

Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] staging: cxt1e1: remove unneeded a value

2014-03-06 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 05:12:48PM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote: > > It doesn't need to assign name array address to np pointer. > > Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn > --- > v2: replace sprintf() with snprintf() and remove memset() call > because snprintf() adds a terminating '\0' Your Subject: does no

[PATCH v2 7/7] staging: cxt1e1: remove unneeded a value

2014-03-06 Thread Daeseok Youn
It doesn't need to assign name array address to np pointer. Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn --- v2: replace sprintf() with snprintf() and remove memset() call because snprintf() adds a terminating '\0' drivers/staging/cxt1e1/linux.c |8 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)