On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:35:00AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:18:30AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:46:18AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > This sounds like the wrong clock polarity. Could you try inverting
> > > sig_
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:18:30AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:46:18AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > This sounds like the wrong clock polarity. Could you try inverting
> > sig_cfg.clk_pol in imx-drm/ipuv3-crtc.c?
>
> I tweaked it a different way - I used de
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:00:26AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:47:17PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Shouldn't the above be in patch 1 (or 1.5) rather than patch 2? Patch 2
>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:47:17PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't the above be in patch 1 (or 1.5) rather than patch 2? Patch 2
> > advertises itself as adding support for the wandboard, but in actual
> > fact it's
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:46:18AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:50:29PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > Answers to these two questions may help stop me wasting a lot of time
> > chasing what is a really weird bug.
> >
> > So, I have X up and running on the Cub
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:50:29PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Answers to these two questions may help stop me wasting a lot of time
> chasing what is a really weird bug.
>
> So, I have X up and running on the Cubox-i carrier-1, using the imx-drm
> stuff (I've slightly hacked my xf86-
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> Okay, next question(s).
>
> 1. How well tested is any of this imx-drm stuff?
>
> 2. What sort of testing has it been subject to?
Most of my tests with the imx-drm driver have been through the LVDS
panel so far.
For HDMI, I haven
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> Shouldn't the above be in patch 1 (or 1.5) rather than patch 2? Patch 2
> advertises itself as adding support for the wandboard, but in actual
> fact it's adding the generic bits too.
Thanks for your review. Will address your co
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 06:40:30PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Another thing that my build testing (and use on cubox-i) picked up:
>
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:51:26PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi
> > inde
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:51:26PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi
> index 9e8ae11..65e54b4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi
> @@ -88,3 +88,7 @@
> crtcs = <&ipu1
Another thing that my build testing (and use on cubox-i) picked up:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:51:26PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi
> index 9e8ae11..65e54b4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boo
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
---
Changes since v1:
- None
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi| 4
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi | 4
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-wandboard.dtsi | 13 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 10 ++
4 files changed
12 matches
Mail list logo
