On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:53:39AM +0800, ZHAO Gang wrote:
>> @@ -2208,8 +2203,11 @@ static int et131x_rx_dma_memory_alloc(struct
>> et131x_adapter *adapter)
>> rx_ring = &adapter->rx_ring;
>>
>> /* Alloc memory for the lookup ta
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:53:39AM +0800, ZHAO Gang wrote:
> @@ -2208,8 +2203,11 @@ static int et131x_rx_dma_memory_alloc(struct
> et131x_adapter *adapter)
> rx_ring = &adapter->rx_ring;
>
> /* Alloc memory for the lookup table */
> - rx_ring->fbr[0] = kmalloc(sizeof(struct fbr_l
The original code allocate rx dma memory in several dma_alloc_coherent calls,
which causes some problems:
1. since dma_alloc_coherent allocate at least one page memory, it wastes some
memory when allocation size is smaller than one page.
2. it causes et131x_rx_dma_memory_free as complex as et131
