On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 01:21:23PM +0200, Martijn Coenen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > I've now applied patches 1, 2, 7, 9, 11, and 12 from this series to my
> > tree, so feel free to rebase on it for the next round of these patches.
>
> Thanks Greg. You should a
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> I've now applied patches 1, 2, 7, 9, 11, and 12 from this series to my
> tree, so feel free to rebase on it for the next round of these patches.
Thanks Greg. You should also be able to apply patch 10 from this
series ("ANDROID: binder: call poll_
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Martijn Coenen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > AFAIK people are actively working on fixing that.
>
> SCHED_DEADLINE was definitely looked at in the past. We certainly
> don't use it on our own devices in Android Oreo, a
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Martijn Coenen wrote:
> Appreciate if you could take a look! In particular I'm curious why
> this approach is considered "dodgy", or "engineered sideways" as
> Thomas pointed out earlier.
The fact that you could not reuse rt_mutex makes me very nervous. O
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> AFAIK people are actively working on fixing that.
SCHED_DEADLINE was definitely looked at in the past. We certainly
don't use it on our own devices in Android Oreo, and I am not aware of
any current plans to use it. But the Android org is b
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:27:58AM +0200, Martijn Coenen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > You fail to support SCHED_DEADLINE, that's not optional.
>
> The reason I didn't include it is that we don't use SCHED_DEADLINE in
> Android userspace.
AFAIK people are
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:04:20AM +0200, Martijn Coenen wrote:
> Adds support for SCHED_BATCH/SCHED_FIFO/SCHED_RR priority inheritance
> to the binder driver. The desired behavior is as follows:
You fail to support SCHED_DEADLINE, that's not optional.
_
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> You fail to support SCHED_DEADLINE, that's not optional.
The reason I didn't include it is that we don't use SCHED_DEADLINE in
Android userspace. Can we add support for this in a follow-up patch,
or do you consider it necessary for accepti
Adds support for SCHED_BATCH/SCHED_FIFO/SCHED_RR priority inheritance
to the binder driver. The desired behavior is as follows:
Each thread in the binder threadpool runs at a default priority, which is
typically nice 0.
Binder nodes (endpoints that can receive binder transactions) can have a
mini
