On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 12:39:18PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16 2016, James Simmons wrote:
>
> >
> > +static inline bool
> > +lsm_md_eq(const struct lmv_stripe_md *lsm1, const struct lmv_stripe_md
> > *lsm2)
> > +{
> > + int idx;
> > +
> > + if (lsm1->lsm_md_magic != lsm2->lsm_m
> On Feb 11, 2018, at 6:44 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 08 2018, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>>
>> Certain things that sound useless (like the debug subsystem in Lustre)
>> is very useful when you have a 10k nodes in a cluster and need to selectively
>> pull stuff from a run to debug a complicat
> On Feb 11, 2018, at 6:50 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> Maybe - as you suggest in another email - it is due to some
> client/server incompatibility. I guess it is unavoidable with an fs
> like lustre to have incompatible protocol changes. Is there any
> mechanism for detecting the version of other
On Sat, Feb 10 2018, James Simmons wrote:
>> > On Feb 8, 2018, at 10:10 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 08 2018, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>> >
>> >>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 8:39 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Aug 16 2016, James Simmons wrote:
>> >>
>> >> my that’s an old patch
>
On Thu, Feb 08 2018, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 10:10 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 08 2018, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>>
On Feb 8, 2018, at 8:39 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16 2016, James Simmons wrote:
>>>
>>> my that’s an old patch
>>>
>> ...
>>>
> > +static inline bool
> > +lsm_md_eq(const struct lmv_stripe_md *lsm1, const struct lmv_stripe_md
> > *lsm2)
> > +{
> > + int idx;
> > +
> > + if (lsm1->lsm_md_magic != lsm2->lsm_md_magic ||
> > + lsm1->lsm_md_stripe_count != lsm2->lsm_md_stripe_count ||
> > + lsm1->lsm_md_maste
> > On Feb 8, 2018, at 10:10 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 08 2018, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> >
> >>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 8:39 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 16 2016, James Simmons wrote:
> >>
> >> my that’s an old patch
> >>
> >>>
> > ...
> >>>
> >>> Whoever converted
> On Feb 8, 2018, at 10:10 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 08 2018, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>
>>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 8:39 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 16 2016, James Simmons wrote:
>>
>> my that’s an old patch
>>
>>>
> ...
>>>
>>> Whoever converted it to "!strcmp()" inverted t
On Thu, Feb 08 2018, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 8:39 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 16 2016, James Simmons wrote:
>
> my that’s an old patch
>
>>
...
>>
>> Whoever converted it to "!strcmp()" inverted the condition. This is a
>> perfect example of why I absolutely *loath
> On Feb 8, 2018, at 8:39 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 16 2016, James Simmons wrote:
my that’s an old patch
>
>>
>> +static inline bool
>> +lsm_md_eq(const struct lmv_stripe_md *lsm1, const struct lmv_stripe_md
>> *lsm2)
>> +{
>> +int idx;
>> +
>> +if (lsm1->lsm_md_magic !=
On Tue, Aug 16 2016, James Simmons wrote:
>
> +static inline bool
> +lsm_md_eq(const struct lmv_stripe_md *lsm1, const struct lmv_stripe_md *lsm2)
> +{
> + int idx;
> +
> + if (lsm1->lsm_md_magic != lsm2->lsm_md_magic ||
> + lsm1->lsm_md_stripe_count != lsm2->lsm_md_stripe_count
From: wang di
Separate master stripe with master object, so
1. stripeEA only exists on master object.
2. sub-stripe object will be inserted into master object
as sub-directory, and it can get the master object by "..".
By this, it will remove those specilities for stripe0 in
LMV and LOD. And als
12 matches
Mail list logo
