Sorry for confusing you.
Actually 1-3 patches already merged to staging-next branch.
And then I had a request resending the rest of the series.
So I just sent 4-7 again. Sorry, I should rebase these patches and
make a series newly.
I will send patches again properly.
I think this patches need to
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:21:01AM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
>
> checkpatch.pl error in linux.c:
> ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
>
> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn
> ---
> drivers/staging/cxt1e1/linux.c | 31 +++
> 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1
Thank you for your kind explanation.
I will do that when my patch is sent again.
regards,
Daeseok Youn.
2014-03-05 17:08 GMT+09:00 Dan Carpenter :
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 04:58:36PM +0900, DaeSeok Youn wrote:
>> Yes, it is not changed anything.
>>
>> But I had a request of greg.
>> He want to r
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 04:58:36PM +0900, DaeSeok Youn wrote:
> Yes, it is not changed anything.
>
> But I had a request of greg.
> He want to resend my patches what he haven't applied to staging-next
> branch because my patches had flushed from his own queue.
>
> And I didn't know how to set the
Yes, it is not changed anything.
But I had a request of greg.
He want to resend my patches what he haven't applied to staging-next
branch because my patches had flushed from his own queue.
And I didn't know how to set the version of patch when it is sent
again without changes in this case.
So I c
Why are you resending a v3 of these?
I did a diff of the emails and the only difference is that you dropped
Ying Xue from the CC list.
regards,
dan carpenter
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/ma
checkpatch.pl error in linux.c:
ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn
---
drivers/staging/cxt1e1/linux.c | 31 +++
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/cxt1e1/linux.c b/drivers/staging/
