On 23/08/13 10:05, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 05:38:51PM +0100, Rupesh Gujare wrote:
+/*--
* Context: softirq-serialized
*/
Don't resend the patch, but these comments are not in kernel style.
It'
On 22/08/13 18:45, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
+void oz_pd_destroy(struct oz_pd *pd)
+{
+int ret;
+
+if (hrtimer_active(&pd->timeout))
+hrtimer_cancel(&pd->timeout);
+if (hrtimer_active(&pd->heartbeat))
+hrtimer_cancel(&pd->heartbeat);
+
+memset(&pd->workitem, 0, sizeof
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 05:38:51PM +0100, Rupesh Gujare wrote:
> +/*--
> * Context: softirq-serialized
> */
Don't resend the patch, but these comments are not in kernel style.
It's explained in Documentation/kernel-doc
Hello.
On 08/22/2013 08:38 PM, Rupesh Gujare wrote:
Currently we call oz_pd_destroy() from softirq context, where we
try to destroy relevant data structures, as well we kill a tasklet
which always result in following kernel warning.
[12279.262194] Attempt to kill tasklet from interrupt
[1227
Currently we call oz_pd_destroy() from softirq context, where we
try to destroy relevant data structures, as well we kill a tasklet
which always result in following kernel warning.
[12279.262194] Attempt to kill tasklet from interrupt
[12279.262202] Attempt to kill tasklet from interrupt
This pat
