On 09/16/13 09:17, Jürgen Beisert wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Sunday 15 September 2013 12:35:29 Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> [...]
>>> +static void mxs_lradc_reg_set(struct mxs_lradc *lradc, u32 val, u32 reg)
>>> +{
>>> + writel(val, lradc->base + reg + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +sta
Dear Juergen Beisert,
> Replace the individual register access by a few shared access function to
> make the code easier to read and in order to add the i.MX23 SoC in the
> next step.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert
> CC: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> CC: de...@driverdev.osuosl.org
>
Hi Jonathan,
On Sunday 15 September 2013 12:35:29 Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> [...]
> > +static void mxs_lradc_reg_set(struct mxs_lradc *lradc, u32 val, u32 reg)
> > +{
> > + writel(val, lradc->base + reg + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void mxs_lradc_reg_clear(struct mxs_lradc *l
On 09/11/13 09:18, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> Replace the individual register access by a few shared access function to
> make the
> code easier to read and in order to add the i.MX23 SoC in the next step.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert
> CC: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> CC: de...@dr
Replace the individual register access by a few shared access function to make
the
code easier to read and in order to add the i.MX23 SoC in the next step.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert
CC: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
CC: de...@driverdev.osuosl.org
CC: Marek Vasut
CC: Fabio Estevam
C
