> "Sitsofe" == Sitsofe Wheeler writes:
>> Last time around we identified this as a problem with Microsoft's
>> interpretation of the T10 SBC spec. And they promised that they are
>> going to fix that.
Sitsofe> OK but if we were happy to wait for Microsoft to fix the
Sitsofe> problem on the h
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:08:28PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > "Sitsofe" == Sitsofe Wheeler writes:
>
> Sitsofe> Microsoft Hyper-V virtual disks currently only claim SPC-2
> Sitsofe> compliance causing the kernel skip checks for features such as
> Sitsofe> thin provisioning even thou
r.kernel.org;
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org; James E.J. Bottomley
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: add try_rc16 blacklist flag
>
> >>>>> "Sitsofe" == Sitsofe Wheeler writes:
>
> Sitsofe> Microsoft Hyper-V virtual disks currently only claim SPC-2
> S
> "Sitsofe" == Sitsofe Wheeler writes:
Sitsofe> Microsoft Hyper-V virtual disks currently only claim SPC-2
Sitsofe> compliance causing the kernel skip checks for features such as
Sitsofe> thin provisioning even though the virtual disk advertises them.
Last time around we identified this as a
Microsoft Hyper-V virtual disks currently only claim SPC-2 compliance causing
the kernel skip checks for features such as thin provisioning even though the
virtual disk advertises them.
Add a blacklist flag that can allow such devices to quirk past READ
CAPACITY(16) guards.
Signed-off-by: Sitsofe
