Re: [PATCH 00/35] second batch of missing lustre 2.8 patches

2016-11-15 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 06:27:57PM +, James Simmons wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:30:30PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > > > More fixes missing from the upstream client. Also a nice cleanup > > > with the removal of cl_req which is no longer needed. More cleanup > > > for lustre_idl.h

Re: [PATCH 00/35] second batch of missing lustre 2.8 patches

2016-11-14 Thread James Simmons
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:30:30PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > > More fixes missing from the upstream client. Also a nice cleanup > > with the removal of cl_req which is no longer needed. More cleanup > > for lustre_idl.h which is a uapi header. Like the last batch these > > patches are indepe

Re: [PATCH 00/35] second batch of missing lustre 2.8 patches

2016-11-14 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:30:30PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > More fixes missing from the upstream client. Also a nice cleanup > with the removal of cl_req which is no longer needed. More cleanup > for lustre_idl.h which is a uapi header. Like the last batch these > patches are independent of or

[PATCH 00/35] second batch of missing lustre 2.8 patches

2016-11-10 Thread James Simmons
More fixes missing from the upstream client. Also a nice cleanup with the removal of cl_req which is no longer needed. More cleanup for lustre_idl.h which is a uapi header. Like the last batch these patches are independent of order. Aditya Pandit (1): staging: lustre: llite: tar restore fails fo