Hi,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:49:24PM -0700, Kathryn Hampton wrote:
> I think I need to rebase and try again. Can someone please explain
> the protocol for sending out the same patch?
In practice it depends on the maintainer but in general the right thing to do is
to indicate the patch version
Hello, I didn't think the first mail went through, and then noticed that the
commit description needed to be shorter than the 76 characters per line
so I ammended it and sent it using git send-email instead of mutt. There
was no change to the source files.
I think I need to rebase and try again. C
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:13:58PM -0800, Kathryn Hampton wrote:
Please turn off html email, as the mail servers will reject it.
> Hi, I'm still working through the steps to get this right. The first mail was
> my first ever attempt at sending to this list, doing a patch, getting mail
> working o
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:23:02PM -0800, Kathryn Hampton wrote:
> This patch addresses line length errors reported by checkpatch.pl that could
> be fixed with simple line breaks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kathryn Hampton
You sent 2 patches with identical subject lines, yet they did different
things :(
This patch addresses line length errors reported by checkpatch.pl that
could be fixed with simple line breaks.
Signed-off-by: Kathryn Hampton
---
drivers/staging/vt6655/baseband.c | 20 ++---
drivers/staging/vt6655/baseband.h | 6 ++-
drivers/staging/vt6655/card.c | 95 +
This patch addresses line length errors reported by checkpatch.pl that could
be fixed with simple line breaks.
Signed-off-by: Kathryn Hampton
---
drivers/staging/vt6655/baseband.c | 20 ++---
drivers/staging/vt6655/baseband.h | 6 ++-
drivers/staging/vt6655/card.c | 95 +
