On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Amitoj Kaur Chawla
wrote:
> Used C89 instead of C99 Comments and removed C99 comments performing
> prints only.
> Problem found using checkpatch.pl
>
> ERROR: do not use C99 // comments
>
> Signed-off-by: Amitoj Kaur Chawla
These changes have already been added
Used C89 instead of C99 Comments and removed C99 comments performing
prints only.
Problem found using checkpatch.pl
ERROR: do not use C99 // comments
Signed-off-by: Amitoj Kaur Chawla
---
drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c | 10 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
dif
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Konrad Zapalowicz
wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c
>> b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c
>> index 8b47c1b..b2137c8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c
>> @@ -17,7 +17
On 06/12, Juston Li wrote:
> fixed all checkpatch.pl ERROR: do not use C99 // comments
>
> Any C99 comments used to comment out code are simply removed.
> Also some of the errors occur inside '#if 0' blocks which I
> might as well fix since checkpatch.pl caught them but the blocks
> themselves sho
fixed all checkpatch.pl ERROR: do not use C99 // comments
Any C99 comments used to comment out code are simply removed.
Also some of the errors occur inside '#if 0' blocks which I
might as well fix since checkpatch.pl caught them but the blocks
themselves should probably be cleaned up later.
Sign
