On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:31:32PM +0530, Yamanappagouda Patil wrote:
> Fixed checkpatch.pl warning on Block comments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yamanappagouda Patil
> ---
Both of your patches did different things, yet you had the same subject
line :(
Please fix them up and resend with unique subjects
Fixed checkpatch.pl warning on Block comments.
Signed-off-by: Yamanappagouda Patil
---
drivers/staging/rtl8192e/dot11d.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_TSProc.c | 2 +-
4 files c
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:32:30PM +0530, Y M Patil wrote:
> This patch fixes block comment coding style warnings.
> And added new line after variable declaration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Y M Patil
Also, I need a "full" name please...
thanks,
greg k-h
___
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:32:30PM +0530, Y M Patil wrote:
> This patch fixes block comment coding style warnings.
> And added new line after variable declaration.
Please only do one-thing-per-patch. If you have to say "And", that's a
huge hint that this should be broken up into multiple patches.
This patch fixes block comment coding style warnings.
And added new line after variable declaration.
Signed-off-by: Y M Patil
---
drivers/staging/rtl8192e/dot11d.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c | 3 ++-
drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging
